> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Imre
> Deak
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 1:41 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/dp: Account for channel coding
> efficiency on UHBR links
> 
> Apply the correct BW allocation overhead and channel coding efficiency on
> UHBR link rates, similarly to DP1.4 link rates.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.mur...@intel.com>

Thanks and Regards,
Arun R Murthy
--------------------
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 10 ----------
>  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 3effafcbb411a..24aebdb715e7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -2398,16 +2398,6 @@ add_bw_alloc_overhead(int link_clock, int
> bw_overhead,
>       int ch_coding_efficiency =
>               drm_dp_bw_channel_coding_efficiency(is_uhbr);
> 
> -     /*
> -      * TODO: adjust for actual UHBR channel coding efficiency and BW
> -      * overhead.
> -      */
> -     if (is_uhbr) {
> -             *data_m = pixel_data_rate;
> -             *data_n = link_data_rate * 8 / 10;
> -             return;
> -     }
> -
>       *data_m = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(mul_u32_u32(pixel_data_rate,
> bw_overhead),
>                                  1000000);
>       *data_n = DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(mul_u32_u32(link_data_rate,
> ch_coding_efficiency),
> --
> 2.39.2

Reply via email to