On Mon, 13 Nov 2023, Imre Deak <[email protected]> wrote:
> Apply the correct BW allocation overhead and channel coding efficiency
> on UHBR link rates, similarly to DP1.4 link rates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 10 ----------
> 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 3effafcbb411a..24aebdb715e7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -2398,16 +2398,6 @@ add_bw_alloc_overhead(int link_clock, int bw_overhead,
> int ch_coding_efficiency =
> drm_dp_bw_channel_coding_efficiency(is_uhbr);
Why do we have this and intel_dp_max_data_rate() separately?
BR,
Jani.
>
> - /*
> - * TODO: adjust for actual UHBR channel coding efficiency and BW
> - * overhead.
> - */
> - if (is_uhbr) {
> - *data_m = pixel_data_rate;
> - *data_n = link_data_rate * 8 / 10;
> - return;
> - }
> -
> *data_m = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(mul_u32_u32(pixel_data_rate, bw_overhead),
> 1000000);
> *data_n = DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(mul_u32_u32(link_data_rate,
> ch_coding_efficiency),
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
