On Tue, 11 Mar 2014, Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]> wrote:
> [email protected] writes:
>
>> From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
>>
>> The display interrupts changed on BDW, so the current ILK-HSW specific
>> code in ilk_pipe_in_vblank_locked() doesn't work there. Add the required
>> bits for BDW, and while at it, change the existing code to use nicer
>> looking vblank status bit macros.
>>
>> Also remove the now stale __raw_i915_read16() definition which was
>> left over from the failed gen2 ISR experiment.
>>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73962
>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
>
> Both patches,
> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>

Both pushed to -fixes, thanks for the patches and review.

Jani.



>
> With regards to changing raw reads to I915_READ:
> I would rather keep the raw_reads here to
> keep the same locking behaviour, for now. Referring to this
> comment in i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos:
>
> /*
>  * Lock uncore.lock, as we will do multiple timing critical raw
>  * register reads, potentially with preemption disabled, so the
>  * following code must not block on uncore.lock.
>  */
>
> -Mika
>
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> index d4c952d..ec9b8a4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> @@ -618,33 +618,25 @@ static u32 gm45_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_device 
>> *dev, int pipe)
>>  
>>  /* raw reads, only for fast reads of display block, no need for forcewake 
>> etc. */
>>  #define __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv__, reg__) readl((dev_priv__)->regs + 
>> (reg__))
>> -#define __raw_i915_read16(dev_priv__, reg__) readw((dev_priv__)->regs + 
>> (reg__))
>>  
>>  static bool ilk_pipe_in_vblank_locked(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe 
>> pipe)
>>  {
>>      struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>      uint32_t status;
>> -
>> -    if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 7) {
>> -            status = pipe == PIPE_A ?
>> -                    DE_PIPEA_VBLANK :
>> -                    DE_PIPEB_VBLANK;
>> +    int reg;
>> +
>> +    if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) {
>> +            status = GEN8_PIPE_VBLANK;
>> +            reg = GEN8_DE_PIPE_ISR(pipe);
>> +    } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 7) {
>> +            status = DE_PIPE_VBLANK_IVB(pipe);
>> +            reg = DEISR;
>>      } else {
>> -            switch (pipe) {
>> -            default:
>> -            case PIPE_A:
>> -                    status = DE_PIPEA_VBLANK_IVB;
>> -                    break;
>> -            case PIPE_B:
>> -                    status = DE_PIPEB_VBLANK_IVB;
>> -                    break;
>> -            case PIPE_C:
>> -                    status = DE_PIPEC_VBLANK_IVB;
>> -                    break;
>> -            }
>> +            status = DE_PIPE_VBLANK(pipe);
>> +            reg = DEISR;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    return __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, DEISR) & status;
>> +    return __raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, reg) & status;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.2
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to