On 11/20/2024 5:22 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024, Ankit Nautiyal <[email protected]> wrote:
Make a separate function for setting fec_enable in crtc_state.
Drop the check for FEC support as its already checked while checking for
DSC support.
That's two changes that generally shouldn't be bundled together.

Aim for separating non-functional refactoring and functional
changes. (Well, arguably dropping the FEC check should also be
non-functional, but you know what I mean.)

Moving to separate helper should indeed have non functional change and dropping the check can be another patch.

Initially I was going with a separate patch for dropping the FEC check, but couldn't make up my mind, and merged the two things. :)

Will do as suggested.



Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++--------
  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index dee15a05e7fd..d82e25d0dc5a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -2352,6 +2352,26 @@ static int intel_edp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct 
intel_dp *intel_dp,
        return 0;
  }
+static void intel_dp_compute_fec_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
+                                       struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
I think all encoder->callback_name hooks should be named
something_something_callback_name(), and the same goes for helpers
specifically aimed at this.

This would make the function intel_dp_fec_compute_config().

Yes, in many ways "compute fec config" reads better, but there's value
in being able to search for "_compute_config", and to know this is only
for he ->compute_config path.

Makes sense to have _fec_compute_config. Will change this.

Thanks Jani, for the comments and suggestions.

Regards,

Ankit




BR,
Jani.


+{
+       if (pipe_config->fec_enable)
+               return;
+
+       /*
+        * Though eDP v1.5 supports FEC with DSC, unlike DP, it is optional.
+        * Since, FEC is a bandwidth overhead, continue to not enable it for
+        * eDP. Until, there is a good reason to do so.
+        */
+       if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
+               return;
+
+       if (intel_dp_is_uhbr(pipe_config))
+               return;
+
+       pipe_config->fec_enable = true;
+}
+
  int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
                                struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
                                struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
@@ -2368,15 +2388,7 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp 
*intel_dp,
        int num_joined_pipes = intel_crtc_num_joined_pipes(pipe_config);
        int ret;
- /*
-        * Though eDP v1.5 supports FEC with DSC, unlike DP, it is optional.
-        * Since, FEC is a bandwidth overhead, continue to not enable it for
-        * eDP. Until, there is a good reason to do so.
-        */
-       pipe_config->fec_enable = pipe_config->fec_enable ||
-               (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
-                intel_dp_supports_fec(intel_dp, connector, pipe_config) &&
-                !intel_dp_is_uhbr(pipe_config));
+       intel_dp_compute_fec_config(intel_dp, pipe_config);
if (!intel_dp_dsc_supports_format(connector, pipe_config->output_format))
                return -EINVAL;

Reply via email to