On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 02:49:30PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote: > Those fields are supposed to be a good default value for the cursor > size, intended for the case where the hardware doesn't support 64x64 > cursors, for use with a hw agnostic DDX driver for instance. > > We're fine with 64x64 cursors though and don't need to set those fields > (DRM core will return 64 is we don't). If we declare 256x256, that > generic driver will use a big buffer for the cursor, without any good > reason.
How does userspace now know that 256x256 cursors are support for HiDPI? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
