From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

For some reason we are switching over to the idle pattern before
disabling the DP port on pre-hsw. AFAICS this has never been part
of the documented sequence (and on hsw+ the spec explicitly says
not to do this). Get rid of it.

The code goes all the way back to commit 5eb08b69f510 ("drm/i915: enable
DisplayPort support on IGDNG"), and it was accompanied by a 17ms delay
which got changed to vbl wait in commit ab527efc2fea ("drm/i915: use
wait_for_vblank instead of msleep(17)"), and was later completely removed
in  commit 93c9c19b3d25 ("drm/i915: remove unexplained vblank wait in
the DP off code").

Smoke tested on g4x/snb/chv.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/g4x_dp.c | 11 -----------
 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/g4x_dp.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/g4x_dp.c
index 87f6b9602b16..b54edf0d1c23 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/g4x_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/g4x_dp.c
@@ -424,17 +424,6 @@ intel_dp_link_down(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 
        drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "\n");
 
-       if ((display->platform.ivybridge && port == PORT_A) ||
-           (HAS_PCH_CPT(display) && port != PORT_A)) {
-               intel_dp->DP &= ~DP_LINK_TRAIN_MASK_CPT;
-               intel_dp->DP |= DP_LINK_TRAIN_PAT_IDLE_CPT;
-       } else {
-               intel_dp->DP &= ~DP_LINK_TRAIN_MASK;
-               intel_dp->DP |= DP_LINK_TRAIN_PAT_IDLE;
-       }
-       intel_de_write(display, intel_dp->output_reg, intel_dp->DP);
-       intel_de_posting_read(display, intel_dp->output_reg);
-
        intel_dp->DP &= ~DP_PORT_EN;
        intel_de_write(display, intel_dp->output_reg, intel_dp->DP);
        intel_de_posting_read(display, intel_dp->output_reg);
-- 
2.49.0

Reply via email to