> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Ankit > Nautiyal > Sent: 18 August 2025 13:01 > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; intel...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com; Nautiyal, Ankit K > <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/vrr: Fix seamless_mn drrs for PTL > > With VRR timing generator always on, the fixed refresh rate is achieved by > setting vrr.flipline and vrr.vmax as the vtotal for the desired mode. > > This creates a problem for seamless_mn drrs feature, where user can > seamlessly set a lower mode on the supporting panels. With VRR timing > generator, the vrr.flipline and vrr.vmax are set to vtotal, but that > corresponds > to the higher mode. > > To fix this, re-compute the vrr timings when seamless_mn drrs is in picture. > At > the same time make sure that the vrr.guardband is set as per the highest mode > for such panels, so that switching between higher to lower mode, does not > change the vrr.guardband. > > v2: Add a new member `use_highest_mode` to vrr struct to help set the vrr > timings for highest mode for the seamless_mn drrs case. > > Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com> > --- > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > index 0d945d1fedd6..5df6fda7c4ba 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > @@ -1318,6 +1318,7 @@ struct intel_crtc_state { > u8 pipeline_full; > u16 flipline, vmin, vmax, guardband; > u32 vsync_end, vsync_start; > + bool use_highest_mode; > } vrr; > > /* Content Match Refresh Rate state */ diff --git > a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > index 2fa80b2750f8..c49d98d18aa5 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > @@ -1741,7 +1741,7 @@ static int intel_dp_max_bpp(struct intel_dp > *intel_dp, > return bpp; > } > > -static bool has_seamless_m_n(struct intel_connector *connector) > +bool has_seamless_m_n(struct intel_connector *connector) > { > struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(connector); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h > index 994994d68475..75470eb7022a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h > @@ -215,5 +215,6 @@ int intel_dp_compute_min_hblank(struct > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, int intel_dp_dsc_bpp_step_x16(const struct > intel_connector *connector); void intel_dp_dpcd_set_probe(struct intel_dp > *intel_dp, bool force_on_external); int intel_dp_compute_sdp_latency(struct > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, bool assume_all_enabled); > +bool has_seamless_m_n(struct intel_connector *connector); > > #endif /* __INTEL_DP_H__ */ > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c > index 170f7bcdb8a8..9c74aec9e416 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > #include "intel_display_regs.h" > #include "intel_display_types.h" > #include "intel_dp.h" > +#include "intel_panel.h" > #include "intel_vrr.h" > #include "intel_vrr_regs.h" > #include "skl_scaler.h" > @@ -299,6 +300,16 @@ void intel_vrr_set_fixed_rr_timings(const struct > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > if (!intel_vrr_possible(crtc_state)) > return; > > + if (crtc_state->vrr.use_highest_mode) { > + intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_VMIN(display, > cpu_transcoder), > + crtc_state->vrr.vmin - 1); > + intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_VMAX(display, > cpu_transcoder), > + crtc_state->vrr.vmax - 1); > + intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_FLIPLINE(display, > cpu_transcoder), > + crtc_state->vrr.flipline - 1); > + return; > + } > + > intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_VMIN(display, cpu_transcoder), > intel_vrr_fixed_rr_vmin(crtc_state) - 1); > intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_VMAX(display, cpu_transcoder), > @@ -318,6 +329,49 @@ void intel_vrr_compute_fixed_rr_timings(struct > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > crtc_state->vrr.flipline = crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vtotal; > } > > +static bool needs_seamless_m_n_timings(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > + struct intel_connector *connector) { > + if (!has_seamless_m_n(connector) || crtc_state->joiner_pipes) > + return false; > + > + return true; > +} > + > +static > +void intel_vrr_compute_fixed_rr_for_seamless_m_n(struct intel_crtc_state > *crtc_state, > + struct intel_connector > *connector) { > + const struct drm_display_mode *highest_mode = > intel_panel_highest_mode(connector); > + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state- > >hw.adjusted_mode; > + int vtotal_new; > + > + /* > + * For panels with seamless_m_n drrs, the user can seamlessly switch > to > + * a lower mode, which has a lower clock. This works with legacy > timing > + * generator, but not with the VRR timing generator. To run the > + * VRR timing generator in fixed refresh rate mode flipline and vmax > + * need to be set to same value. > + * > + * The function intel_vrr_compute_fixed_rr_timings set these to the > + * VTOTAL. However, for this case we need to set the set the flipline > + * and vmax to a higher value such that the VRR Timing generator can > + * work with the desired fixed lower rate. > + */ > + if (highest_mode && adjusted_mode->crtc_clock < highest_mode- > >clock) { > + vtotal_new = adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal * > DIV_ROUND_UP(highest_mode->clock, > + > adjusted_mode->crtc_clock); > + crtc_state->vrr.flipline = vtotal_new; > + crtc_state->vrr.vmax = vtotal_new; > + crtc_state->vrr.vmin = vtotal_new; > + crtc_state->vrr.use_highest_mode = true; > + > + return; > + } > + > + intel_vrr_compute_fixed_rr_timings(crtc_state); > +} > + > static > int intel_vrr_compute_vmin(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) { @@ -396,6 > +450,9 @@ intel_vrr_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > intel_vrr_compute_vrr_timings(crtc_state); > else if (is_cmrr_frac_required(crtc_state) && is_edp) > intel_vrr_compute_cmrr_timings(crtc_state); > + Typo: new line not required ? > + else if (needs_seamless_m_n_timings(crtc_state, connector)) > + intel_vrr_compute_fixed_rr_for_seamless_m_n(crtc_state, > connector); I am not exactly sure, but could this become a special case of fixer rr timings ? as below while computing intel_vrr_compute_fixed_rr_timings, above logic could also be addressed ? or should be kept as a separate case from Adaptive mode and fixed rr mode ? > else > intel_vrr_compute_fixed_rr_timings(crtc_state); > > @@ -478,6 +535,7 @@ int intel_vrr_compute_guardband(struct > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, { > const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state- > >hw.adjusted_mode; > struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state); > + const struct drm_display_mode *highest_mode; > int dsc_prefill_time = 0; > int psr2_pr_latency = 0; > int scaler_prefill_time; > @@ -490,6 +548,22 @@ int intel_vrr_compute_guardband(struct > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > int guardband; > int pm_delay; > > + /* > + * For seamless m_n the clock is changed while other modeline > + * parameters are same. In that case the linetime_us will change, > + * causing the guardband to change, and the seamless switch to > + * lower mode would not take place. > + * To avoid this, take the highest mode where panel supports > + * seamless drrs and make guardband equal to the vblank length > + * for the highest mode. > + */ > + highest_mode = intel_panel_highest_mode(connector); > + if (needs_seamless_m_n_timings(crtc_state, connector) && > highest_mode) { > + guardband = highest_mode->vtotal - highest_mode->vdisplay; > + > + return guardband; > + } > + > linetime_us = DIV_ROUND_UP(adjusted_mode->crtc_htotal * 1000, > adjusted_mode->crtc_clock); > > -- > 2.45.2
RE: [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/vrr: Fix seamless_mn drrs for PTL
Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar Tue, 19 Aug 2025 04:44:20 -0700
- RE: [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915/alpm: Add... Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
- [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/vrr: Use vrr.sync... Ankit Nautiyal
- [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915/display: Add guar... Ankit Nautiyal
- RE: [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915/display: ... Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
- [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915/skl_watermark: Re... Ankit Nautiyal
- [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915/vrr: Use static g... Ankit Nautiyal
- RE: [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915/vrr: Use ... Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
- [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915/panel: Refactor h... Ankit Nautiyal
- RE: [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915/panel: Re... Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
- [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/vrr: Fix seamless... Ankit Nautiyal
- RE: [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/vrr: Fix ... Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
- ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Optimize vrr.... Patchwork
- ✓ i915.CI.Full: success for Optimize vrr... Patchwork
- [PATCH 00/12] Optimize vrr.guardband and fix ... Ankit Nautiyal
- [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915/skl_watermark: Fi... Ankit Nautiyal
- [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915/dp: Add SDP laten... Ankit Nautiyal
- [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/skl_watermark: Pa... Ankit Nautiyal
- [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915/alpm: Add functio... Ankit Nautiyal
- [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/display: Extract ... Ankit Nautiyal
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/display: ... Jani Nikula
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/displ... Nautiyal, Ankit K