On Mon, 27 Oct 2025, Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > for the series > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
Thanks! > Some thoughts: Consider merging patches 1 and 2 OR split off the change > to ttm_resource.h from patch 3. Doing the latter would make a revert of > the forward declaration easier in case some trees stop building. Feel > free to put everything into drm-misc-next if that still compiles then. I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're getting at. The series is bisectable, and in the first patch the indirect source of drm_print.h is drm_mm.h, and in the third patch it's ttm_resource.h. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel
