On Wed, 10 Dec 2025, "Manna, Animesh" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2025 2:25 PM
>> To: Manna, Animesh <[email protected]>; intel-
>> [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Cc: Manna, Animesh <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Panel Replay BW optimization for
>> DP2.0 tunneling
>> 
>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2025, Animesh Manna <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Unused bandwidth can be used by external display agents for Panel
>> > Replay enabled DP panel during idleness with link on. Enable source to
>> > replace dummy data from the display with data from another agent by
>> > programming TRANS_DP2_CTL [Panel Replay Tunneling Enable].
>> >
>> > Bspec: 68920
>> > Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <[email protected]>
>> > ---
>> >  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_regs.h |  1 +
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
>> >  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_regs.h
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_regs.h
>> > index 9e0d853f4b61..b6fc249a9f09 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_regs.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_regs.h
>> > @@ -2051,6 +2051,7 @@
>> >  #define TRANS_DP2_CTL(trans)                      _MMIO_TRANS(trans,
>> _TRANS_DP2_CTL_A, _TRANS_DP2_CTL_B)
>> >  #define  TRANS_DP2_128B132B_CHANNEL_CODING        REG_BIT(31)
>> >  #define  TRANS_DP2_PANEL_REPLAY_ENABLE            REG_BIT(30)
>> > +#define  TRANS_DP2_PR_TUNNELING_ENABLE            REG_BIT(26)
>> >  #define  TRANS_DP2_DEBUG_ENABLE                   REG_BIT(23)
>> >
>> >  #define _TRANS_DP2_VFREQHIGH_A                    0x600a4
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> > index 2a378a5adc59..d0a01a08299e 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>> >  #include "intel_dmc.h"
>> >  #include "intel_dp.h"
>> >  #include "intel_dp_aux.h"
>> > +#include "intel_dp_tunnel.h"
>> >  #include "intel_dsb.h"
>> >  #include "intel_frontbuffer.h"
>> >  #include "intel_hdmi.h"
>> > @@ -2152,6 +2153,25 @@ static bool psr_interrupt_error_check(struct
>> intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> >    return true;
>> >  }
>> >
>> > +static void intel_psr_set_pr_bw_optimization(struct intel_dp
>> > +*intel_dp) {
>> > +  struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
>> > +  u8 val;
>> > +
>> > +  if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 35)
>> > +          return;
>> > +
>> > +  if (!intel_dp_tunnel_bw_alloc_is_enabled(intel_dp))
>> > +          return;
>> > +
>> > +  drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TUNNELING_CAPABILITIES,
>> &val);
>> > +  if (!(val & DP_PANEL_REPLAY_OPTIMIZATION_SUPPORT))
>> > +          return;
>> > +
>> > +  intel_de_rmw(display, TRANS_DP2_CTL(intel_dp->psr.transcoder), 0,
>> > +               TRANS_DP2_PR_TUNNELING_ENABLE); }
>> 
>> Why is this so separated from dg2_activate_panel_replay()?
>
> I felt this feature more leaning towards DP tunneling, so kept outside of 
> dg2_activate_panel_replay().
> But this is just after intel_psr_activate().

On *one* path calling intel_psr_activate(). Why not others?

>
> Regards,
> Animesh
>> 
>> > +
>> >  static void intel_psr_enable_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> >                                const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)  
>> > {
>> @@ -2221,6
>> > +2241,9 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> >    intel_dp->psr.link_ok = true;
>> >
>> >    intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
>> > +
>> > +  if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) && intel_dp-
>> >psr.panel_replay_enabled)
>> > +          intel_psr_set_pr_bw_optimization(intel_dp);
>> >  }
>> >
>> >  static void intel_psr_exit(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> 
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

Reply via email to