Matt Roper <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 09:59:22AM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: >> Matt Roper <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 06:43:19PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: >> >> From: Shekhar Chauhan <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> Add platform definition along with device IDs for NVL-P. >> > >> > Not sure if you wanted to add bspec references to this one like you had >> > for the Xe3p_LPG descriptor, but the flags you have here look correct to >> > me for now and the PCI IDs look correct so, >> > >> > Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <[email protected]> >> >> Thanks! >> >> I'll send v2 with the list of fields and Bspec references. I'm >> copying/pasting them here as well, just in case you can spot any errors >> before I post v2: >> >> .dma_mask_size (Bspec 74198) > > This matches the way we've justified this field on past platforms, > although we've discovered that the "physical address range" value on > that page doesn't necessarily directly translate to the dma_mask_size we > need to use in software; there are cases like ADL-S where it isn't an > exact match due to other characteristics of the base platform (MKTE and > such). But that extra information isn't really available in the > graphics bspec, so I don't think we have any better reference that can > be given. > >> .has_cached_pt (Bspec 71582) >> .has_display (Bspec 74196) >> .has_flat_ccs (Bspec 65255) > > Not sure if this is the best page for FlatCCS since it doesn't really > indicate that a platform does/doesn't support it (e.g., the page doesn't > drop out when the bspec is filtered to platforms like CRI that lack > compression). > > A better reference might be 74110 since it has a yes/no on compression > support by platform.
Updated. Thanks! -- Gustavo Sousa
