On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 06:12:23PM +0200, Murthy, Arun R wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Intel-gfx <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Imre
> > Deak
> > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2026 11:58 PM
> > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/dp_tunnel: Sanitize documentation of
> > intel_dp_tunnel_detect()
> > 
> > Clarify the documentation of detect_new_tunnel() return values, including 
> > the
> > failure case.
> > 
>
> Can this change be merged with the previous patch as the previous
> patch makes this change.

There is no functional change. This patch merely clarifies the
formatting of the return value documentation and documents the failure
case, which was already possible before this patchset. Therefore, I
think this is a separate change that should be submitted as a separate
patch.

> Thanks and Regards,
> Arun R Murthy
> -------------------
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c | 9 ++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c
> > index 5840b92dace19..1c552a7091897 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c
> > @@ -241,9 +241,12 @@ static int detect_new_tunnel(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp, struct drm_modeset_acqui
> >   * tunnel. If the tunnel's state change requires this - for instance the
> >   * tunnel's group ID has changed - the tunnel will be dropped and 
> > recreated.
> >   *
> > - * Return 0 in case of success - after any tunnel detected and added to
> > - * @intel_dp - 1 in case the BW on an already existing tunnel has changed 
> > in a
> > - * way that requires notifying user space.
> > + * Returns:
> > + * - 0 in case of success - after any tunnel detected and added to
> > + @intel_dp
> > + * - 1 in case the link BW via the new or an already existing tunnel has
> > changed
> > + *   in a way that requires notifying user space
> > + * - Negative error code, if creating a new tunnel or updating the tunnel
> > + *   state failed
> >   */
> >  int intel_dp_tunnel_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct
> > drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)  {
> > --
> > 2.49.1
> 

Reply via email to