> -----Original Message-----
> From: Deak, Imre <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 10:15 PM
> To: Murthy, Arun R <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/dp_tunnel: Sanitize documentation of
> intel_dp_tunnel_detect()
> 
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 06:12:23PM +0200, Murthy, Arun R wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Intel-gfx <[email protected]> On Behalf
> > > Of Imre Deak
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2026 11:58 PM
> > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > Subject: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/dp_tunnel: Sanitize documentation of
> > > intel_dp_tunnel_detect()
> > >
> > > Clarify the documentation of detect_new_tunnel() return values,
> > > including the failure case.
> > >
> >
> > Can this change be merged with the previous patch as the previous
> > patch makes this change.
> 
> There is no functional change. This patch merely clarifies the formatting of 
> the
> return value documentation and documents the failure case, which was already
> possible before this patchset. Therefore, I think this is a separate change 
> that
> should be submitted as a separate patch.
> 
This change in the return value was introduced in the previous patch, so 
updating the function header documentation  in the same patch would be better.

Thanks and Regards,
Arun R Murthy
--------------------
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Arun R Murthy
> > -------------------
> > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c | 9 ++++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c
> > > index 5840b92dace19..1c552a7091897 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_tunnel.c
> > > @@ -241,9 +241,12 @@ static int detect_new_tunnel(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp, struct drm_modeset_acqui
> > >   * tunnel. If the tunnel's state change requires this - for instance the
> > >   * tunnel's group ID has changed - the tunnel will be dropped and
> recreated.
> > >   *
> > > - * Return 0 in case of success - after any tunnel detected and
> > > added to
> > > - * @intel_dp - 1 in case the BW on an already existing tunnel has
> > > changed in a
> > > - * way that requires notifying user space.
> > > + * Returns:
> > > + * - 0 in case of success - after any tunnel detected and added to
> > > + @intel_dp
> > > + * - 1 in case the link BW via the new or an already existing
> > > + tunnel has
> > > changed
> > > + *   in a way that requires notifying user space
> > > + * - Negative error code, if creating a new tunnel or updating the tunnel
> > > + *   state failed
> > >   */
> > >  int intel_dp_tunnel_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct
> > > drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)  {
> > > --
> > > 2.49.1
> >

Reply via email to