On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 12:43:41AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 02:24:26PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Detect DPRX capability changes without a long HPD or RX_CAP_CHANGED
> > signal and queue a corresponding link params reset.
> > 
> > Besides detecting the above unexpected capability changes, this also
> > avoids races between queuing and handling a deferred link params reset.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > index 6c4dadfc35806..dd968c2d9fa64 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -362,19 +362,25 @@ int intel_dp_max_source_lane_count(struct 
> > intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> >     return max_lanes;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/* Theoretical max between source and sink */
> > -static void intel_dp_set_max_common_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > +/*
> > + * Theoretical max between source and sink.
> > + * Return %true if the max common lane count changed.
> > + */
> > +static bool intel_dp_set_max_common_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  {
> >     struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> >     int source_max = intel_dp_max_source_lane_count(dig_port);
> >     int sink_max = intel_dp->max_sink_lane_count;
> >     int lane_max = intel_tc_port_max_lane_count(dig_port);
> >     int lttpr_max = 
> > drm_dp_lttpr_max_lane_count(intel_dp->lttpr_common_caps);
> > +   int old_max_common_lane_count = intel_dp->max_common_lane_count;
> >  
> >     if (lttpr_max)
> >             sink_max = min(sink_max, lttpr_max);
> >  
> >     intel_dp->max_common_lane_count = min3(source_max, sink_max, lane_max);
> > +
> > +   return intel_dp->max_common_lane_count != old_max_common_lane_count;
> >  }
> >  
> >  int intel_dp_max_common_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > @@ -792,13 +798,20 @@ int intel_dp_link_config_index(struct intel_dp 
> > *intel_dp, int link_rate, int lan
> >     return -1;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void intel_dp_set_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > +/* Return %true if the common rates changed. */
> > +static bool intel_dp_set_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  {
> >     struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> > +   int num_old_common_rates = intel_dp->num_common_rates;
> > +   int old_common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
> >  
> >     drm_WARN_ON(display->drm,
> >                 !intel_dp->num_source_rates || !intel_dp->num_sink_rates);
> >  
> > +   static_assert(sizeof(old_common_rates) == 
> > sizeof(intel_dp->common_rates));
> 
> Could also assert the element size/type match. Maybe (as a followup
> later) introduce a proper type for this rates[]+num construct and then
> we could just copy the darn thing with a normal assignment and not have
> to worry about this kind of stuff at all...

Yes, makes sense. I'd have to pass common rates to
intel_dp_link_config_init() later (in the link capability refactor
patchset), so could do what you suggest at that point.

The struct could be used then for source and sink rates as well.

> 
> > +   memcpy(old_common_rates, intel_dp->common_rates,
> > +          num_old_common_rates * sizeof(old_common_rates[0]));
> > +
> >     intel_dp->num_common_rates = intersect_rates(intel_dp->source_rates,
> >                                                  intel_dp->num_source_rates,
> >                                                  intel_dp->sink_rates,
> > @@ -810,13 +823,26 @@ static void intel_dp_set_common_rates(struct intel_dp 
> > *intel_dp)
> >             intel_dp->common_rates[0] = 162000;
> >             intel_dp->num_common_rates = 1;
> >     }
> > +
> > +   return num_old_common_rates != intel_dp->num_common_rates ||
> > +          memcmp(old_common_rates, intel_dp->common_rates,
> > +                 num_old_common_rates * sizeof(old_common_rates[0]));
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void intel_dp_set_common_link_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > +/* Return %true if any common link param changed. */
> > +static bool intel_dp_set_common_link_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  {
> > -   intel_dp_set_common_rates(intel_dp);
> > -   intel_dp_set_max_common_lane_count(intel_dp);
> > +   bool params_changed = false;
> > +
> > +   if (intel_dp_set_common_rates(intel_dp))
> > +           params_changed = true;
> > +
> > +   if (intel_dp_set_max_common_lane_count(intel_dp))
> > +           params_changed = true;
> > +
> >     intel_dp_link_config_init(intel_dp);
> > +
> > +   return params_changed;
> >  }
> >  
> >  bool intel_dp_link_params_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int link_rate,
> > @@ -4911,9 +4937,19 @@ intel_dp_has_sink_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  
> >  void intel_dp_update_sink_caps(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  {
> > +   struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> > +
> >     intel_dp_set_sink_rates(intel_dp);
> >     intel_dp_set_max_sink_lane_count(intel_dp);
> > -   intel_dp_set_common_link_params(intel_dp);
> > +   /*
> > +    * Handle unexpected sink cap changes, or a race between setting
> > +    * the deferred link params flag in the HPD IRQ handler and
> > +    * clearing the flag during connector detect.
> > +    */
> > +   if (intel_dp_set_common_link_params(intel_dp) &&
> > +       intel_dp_reset_link_params_defer(intel_dp))
> > +           drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
> > +                       "DPRX capabilities changed before long HPD or 
> > RX_CAP_CHANGED signal\n");
> >  }
> >  
> >  static bool
> > -- 
> > 2.49.1
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

Reply via email to