On Wed, 10 Jun 2026, Ville Syrjala <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
>
> The debug spew for the cdclk pcode per/post notify is very
> inconsistent between different platforms. Unify it all to
> the same form.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 65 ++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 09981a112db4..542724256d0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
>       ret = intel_parent_pcode_write(display, 
> BDW_PCODE_DISPLAY_FREQ_CHANGE_REQ, 0x0);
>       if (ret) {
>               drm_err(display->drm,
> -                     "failed to inform pcode about cdclk change\n");
> +                     "Failed to inform PCODE about start of CDCLK change 
> (%d)\n", ret);
>               return;
>       }
>  
> @@ -918,8 +918,11 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
>       if (ret)
>               drm_err(display->drm, "Switching back to LCPLL failed\n");
>  
> -     intel_parent_pcode_write(display, HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
> -                              cdclk_config->voltage_level);
> +     ret = intel_parent_pcode_write(display, HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
> +                                    cdclk_config->voltage_level);
> +     if (ret)
> +             drm_err(display->drm,
> +                     "Failed to inform PCODE about end of CDCLK change 
> (%d)\n", ret);
>  
>       intel_de_write(display, CDCLK_FREQ,
>                      DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk, 1000) - 1);
> @@ -1181,7 +1184,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
>                                        SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
>       if (ret) {
>               drm_err(display->drm,
> -                     "Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (%d)\n", ret);
> +                     "Failed to inform PCODE about start of CDCLK change 
> (%d)\n", ret);
>               return;
>       }
>  
> @@ -1221,8 +1224,11 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct intel_display 
> *display,
>       intel_de_posting_read(display, CDCLK_CTL);
>  
>       /* inform PCU of the change */
> -     intel_parent_pcode_write(display, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> -                              cdclk_config->voltage_level);
> +     ret = intel_parent_pcode_write(display, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> +                                    cdclk_config->voltage_level);
> +     if (ret)
> +             drm_err(display->drm,
> +                     "Failed to inform PCODE about end of CDCLK change 
> (%d)\n", ret);
>  
>       intel_update_cdclk(display);
>  }
> @@ -2263,8 +2269,7 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
>  
>       if (ret) {
>               drm_err(display->drm,
> -                     "Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (err %d, freq 
> %d)\n",
> -                     ret, cdclk);
> +                     "Failed to inform PCODE about start of CDCLK change 
> (%d)\n", ret);
>               return;
>       }
>  
> @@ -2299,8 +2304,7 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
>                                                      
> cdclk_config->voltage_level, 2);
>       if (ret)
>               drm_err(display->drm,
> -                     "PCode CDCLK freq set failed, (err %d, freq %d)\n",
> -                     ret, cdclk);
> +                     "Failed to inform PCODE about end of CDCLK change 
> (%d)\n", ret);
>  
>       intel_update_cdclk(display);
>  
> @@ -2571,14 +2575,13 @@ void intel_cdclk_dump_config(struct intel_display 
> *display,
>                   cdclk_config->voltage_level);
>  }
>  
> -static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(struct intel_display *display,
> -                                u8 voltage_level,
> -                                u8 active_pipe_count,
> -                                u16 cdclk,
> -                                bool cdclk_update_valid,
> -                                bool pipe_count_update_valid)
> +static int dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(struct intel_display *display,
> +                               u8 voltage_level,
> +                               u8 active_pipe_count,
> +                               u16 cdclk,
> +                               bool cdclk_update_valid,
> +                               bool pipe_count_update_valid)
>  {
> -     int ret;
>       u32 update_mask = 0;
>  
>       update_mask = DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_UPDATE_MASK(cdclk, active_pipe_count, 
> voltage_level);
> @@ -2589,14 +2592,10 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(struct 
> intel_display *display,
>       if (pipe_count_update_valid)
>               update_mask |= DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_PIPE_COUNT_VALID;
>  
> -     ret = intel_parent_pcode_request(display, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> -                                      update_mask,
> -                                      SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
> -                                      SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
> -     if (ret)
> -             drm_err(display->drm,
> -                     "Failed to inform PCU about display config (err %d)\n",
> -                     ret);
> +     return intel_parent_pcode_request(display, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> +                                       update_mask,
> +                                       SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
> +                                       SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
> @@ -2674,6 +2673,7 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_pre_notify(struct 
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>               intel_atomic_get_new_cdclk_state(state);
>       unsigned int cdclk = 0; u8 voltage_level, num_active_pipes = 0;
>       bool change_cdclk, update_pipe_count;
> +     int ret;
>  
>       if (!intel_cdclk_changed(&old_cdclk_state->actual,
>                                &new_cdclk_state->actual) &&
> @@ -2708,8 +2708,11 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_pre_notify(struct 
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>       if (update_pipe_count)
>               num_active_pipes = dg2_power_well_count(display, 
> new_cdclk_state);
>  
> -     dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(display, voltage_level, num_active_pipes, cdclk,
> -                            change_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
> +     ret = dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(display, voltage_level, num_active_pipes, 
> cdclk,
> +                                  change_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
> +     if (ret)
> +             drm_err(display->drm,
> +                     "Failed to inform PCODE about start of CDCLK change 
> (%d)\n", ret);
>  }
>  
>  static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_post_notify(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> @@ -2721,6 +2724,7 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_post_notify(struct 
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>               intel_atomic_get_old_cdclk_state(state);
>       unsigned int cdclk = 0; u8 voltage_level, num_active_pipes = 0;
>       bool update_cdclk, update_pipe_count;
> +     int ret;
>  
>       /* According to "Sequence After Frequency Change", set voltage to used 
> level */
>       voltage_level = new_cdclk_state->actual.voltage_level;
> @@ -2747,8 +2751,11 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_post_notify(struct 
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>       if (update_pipe_count)
>               num_active_pipes = dg2_power_well_count(display, 
> new_cdclk_state);
>  
> -     dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(display, voltage_level, num_active_pipes, cdclk,
> -                            update_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
> +     ret = dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(display, voltage_level, num_active_pipes, 
> cdclk,
> +                                  update_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
> +     if (ret)
> +             drm_err(display->drm,
> +                     "Failed to inform PCODE about end of CDCLK change 
> (%d)\n", ret);
>  }
>  
>  bool intel_cdclk_is_decreasing_later(struct intel_atomic_state *state)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

Reply via email to