On Fri, 11 Sep 2026, Patchwork <[email protected]> wrote: > Possible new issues > ------------------- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_173812v1_full: > > ### IGT changes ### > > #### Possible regressions #### > > * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@engines-mixed-process@vcs1: > - shard-mtlp: [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +1 other test abort > [1]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_19124/shard-mtlp-4/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@[email protected] > [2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_173812v1/shard-mtlp-3/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@[email protected] > > * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@engines-mixed-process@vecs0: > - shard-mtlp: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] > [3]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_19124/shard-mtlp-4/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@[email protected] > [4]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_173812v1/shard-mtlp-3/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@[email protected] > > * igt@perf_pmu@rc6@runtime-pm-long-gt1: > - shard-mtlp: [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] +5 other tests fail > [5]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_19124/shard-mtlp-2/igt@perf_pmu@[email protected] > [6]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_173812v1/shard-mtlp-7/igt@perf_pmu@[email protected]
These look worrying, but I'm not sure how the patches at hand could cause them on MTL. Ville, ack on merging the series? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel
