On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 08:35:27AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2014 17:18:40 +0200 > Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 08:06:06AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 16:09:35 +0200 > > > Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > > > > > > > We can apperently miss them, but breaking the entire driver hampers > > > > testing. So bail out after one minute, our customerary "this is a lost > > > > cause" timeout. > > > > > > > > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78383 > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 +++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > > index 0f8f9bcb3012..6eca24d8b282 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > > @@ -3284,8 +3284,9 @@ static void > > > > intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > > > > > > > > WARN_ON(waitqueue_active(&dev_priv->pending_flip_queue)); > > > > > > > > - wait_event(dev_priv->pending_flip_queue, > > > > - !intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(crtc)); > > > > + WARN_ON(wait_event_timeout(dev_priv->pending_flip_queue, > > > > + !intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(crtc), > > > > + 60*HZ) == 0); > > > > > > > > mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); > > > > intel_finish_fb(crtc->primary->fb); > > > > > > Updating our page flip ioctl man page (hah!) with the timeout info > > > would be good, in case people like Mario queue flips for after lunch. :) > > > > We don't do that in the kernel though, we only ever queue flips for the > > next vblank after rendering completed. Completed rendering we can detect > > (and have 60s timeouts in other places where the hangcheck isn't > > guaranteed to be around already), the additional vblank is negligible imo. > > > > Of course if we add support for flip queues in the kernel we might need to > > cancel outstanding flips properly when we kill the crtc, like we already > > do for vblank events. > > > > So imo no need to document anything. > > Ah right so we'd only be affected here by ridiculous refresh rates... > so yeah should be fine.
If we are that concerned we could factor those into the timeout, say hangcheck + 10 * frame_interval. > Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> Anyhow, I'd been meaning to do this myself, just kept wondering if perhaps hangcheck was a better place to drive it from. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
