Depending upon one module option to be sanitized (through USES_PPGTT)
for the other is a bit too fragile for my taste. At least WARN about
this.
Cc: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 21f7f1cce86e..44721292eb77 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
int intel_sanitize_enable_execlists(struct drm_device *dev, int
enable_execlists)
{
+ WARN_ON(i915.enable_ppgtt == -1);
+
if (enable_execlists == 0)
return 0;
--
2.0.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
