Use the correct mask for the unlock bits. In theory this could have lead
to incorrect asserts but this is unlikely in practise.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 0b327ebb2d9e..fe1d00dc9ef5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@ static void assert_panel_unlocked(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv,
val = I915_READ(pp_reg);
if (!(val & PANEL_POWER_ON) ||
- ((val & PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS) == PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS))
+ ((val & PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK) == PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS))
locked = false;
if (I915_READ(lvds_reg) & LVDS_PIPEB_SELECT)
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
