On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:06:25PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Use the correct mask for the unlock bits. In theory this could have lead
> to incorrect asserts but this is unlikely in practise.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 0b327ebb2d9e..fe1d00dc9ef5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@ static void assert_panel_unlocked(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>       val = I915_READ(pp_reg);
>       if (!(val & PANEL_POWER_ON) ||
> -         ((val & PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS) == PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS))
> +         ((val & PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK) == PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS))
>               locked = false;
>  
>       if (I915_READ(lvds_reg) & LVDS_PIPEB_SELECT)
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to