On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:06:25PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > Use the correct mask for the unlock bits. In theory this could have lead > to incorrect asserts but this is unlikely in practise. > > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 0b327ebb2d9e..fe1d00dc9ef5 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@ static void assert_panel_unlocked(struct > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > val = I915_READ(pp_reg); > if (!(val & PANEL_POWER_ON) || > - ((val & PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS) == PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS)) > + ((val & PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK) == PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS)) > locked = false; > > if (I915_READ(lvds_reg) & LVDS_PIPEB_SELECT) > -- > 1.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
