On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:40:42PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more
> time for idleness.
>
> v2: Rebase over intel_psr.c and fix typo.
> v3: Revival: Manual tests indicated that this is needed. With a short delay
> there is a huge
> risk of getting blank screens when planes are being enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index afb8b8c..a6028b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -597,6 +597,12 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> enum pipe pipe;
> + /* On HSW/BDW Hardware controls idle_frames to go to PSR entry state
> + * However on VLV we go to PSR active state with psr work. So let's
> + * wait more time. The main reason is to give more time when primary
> + * plane is getting enabled avoiding blank screens.
> + */
> + int delay = msecs_to_jiffies(HAS_DDI(dev) ? 100 : 5000);
Same question as before: Shouldn't we look at vbt perhaps like on ddi
platforms to compute a reasonable delay? 5s is kinda not reasonable I
think ;-)
-Daniel
>
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
> @@ -629,7 +635,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_device *dev,
>
> if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)
> schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,
> - msecs_to_jiffies(100));
> + msecs_to_jiffies(delay));
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
