On Tue, 03 Mar 2015, Mika Kahola <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is a first of series patches that optimize DP link
> training. The first patch is for eDP only where we reuse
> the previously trained link training values from cache
> i.e. voltage swing and pre-emphasis levels.
>
> In case we are not able to train the link by reusing
> the known values, the link training parameters are set
> to zero and training is restarted.

Apologies for taking about forever and a half to get back to this. :(

See comments inline.

BR,
Jani.

>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  | 75 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index d1141d3..9497eb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3294,6 +3294,25 @@ intel_dp_reset_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, 
> uint32_t *DP,
>  }
>  
>  static bool
> +intel_dp_reuse_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint32_t *DP,
> +                       uint8_t dp_train_pat)
> +{
> +     struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> +     struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
> +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +
> +     intel_dp_set_signal_levels(intel_dp, DP);
> +
> +     I915_WRITE(intel_dp->output_reg, *DP);
> +     POSTING_READ(intel_dp->output_reg);
> +
> +     drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TRAINING_LANE0_SET,
> +                       intel_dp->train_set, intel_dp->lane_count);
> +
> +     return intel_dp_set_link_train(intel_dp, DP, dp_train_pat);
> +}

So I'd think intel_dp_reuse_link_train should be exactly the same as
intel_dp_reset_link_train, except for the memset part. Maybe just look
at ->link_trained, and memset if not. And make sure you change
->link_trained at approapriate places *before* making the call.

> +
> +static bool
>  intel_dp_update_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint32_t *DP,
>                          const uint8_t link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE])
>  {
> @@ -3356,6 +3375,7 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>       int voltage_tries, loop_tries;
>       uint32_t DP = intel_dp->DP;
>       uint8_t link_config[2];
> +     uint8_t link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE];

This is an unrelated change.

>  
>       if (HAS_DDI(dev))
>               intel_ddi_prepare_link_retrain(encoder);
> @@ -3373,20 +3393,33 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>       DP |= DP_PORT_EN;
>  
> -     /* clock recovery */
> -     if (!intel_dp_reset_link_train(intel_dp, &DP,
> -                                    DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_1 |
> -                                    DP_LINK_SCRAMBLING_DISABLE)) {
> -             DRM_ERROR("failed to enable link training\n");
> -             return;
> +     /*
> +      * check if eDP has already trained. Reset voltage swing and
> +      * pre-emphasis levels if that's not the case.
> +      */
> +     if (intel_dp->link_trained) {

I know what you mean with ->link_trained, but I think the naming is
misleading. It doesn't mean we would have a link up and running. Maybe
it should be ->train_set_valid or something?

> +             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("reuse current link train set\n");
> +             if (!intel_dp_reuse_link_train(intel_dp, &DP,
> +                                            DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_1 |
> +                                            DP_LINK_SCRAMBLING_DISABLE)) {
> +                     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to set link training\n");
> +                     return;
> +             }
> +     } else {
> +             /* reset link training values */
> +             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("reset link train set\n");
> +             if (!intel_dp_reset_link_train(intel_dp, &DP,
> +                                            DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_1 |
> +                                            DP_LINK_SCRAMBLING_DISABLE)) {
> +                     DRM_ERROR("failed to enable link training\n");
> +                     return;
> +             }
>       }
>  
>       voltage = 0xff;
>       voltage_tries = 0;
>       loop_tries = 0;
>       for (;;) {
> -             uint8_t link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE];
> -
>               drm_dp_link_train_clock_recovery_delay(intel_dp->dpcd);
>               if (!intel_dp_get_link_status(intel_dp, link_status)) {
>                       DRM_ERROR("failed to get link status\n");
> @@ -3398,6 +3431,24 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>                       break;
>               }
>  
> +             /*
> +              * if we used previously trained voltage and pre-emphasis values
> +              * and we don't get clock recovery, reset link training values
> +              */
> +             if (intel_dp->link_trained) {
> +                     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("clock recovery not ok, reset");
> +                     if (!intel_dp_reset_link_train(intel_dp, &DP,
> +                                                    DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_1 |
> +                                                    
> DP_LINK_SCRAMBLING_DISABLE)) {
> +                             DRM_ERROR("failed to enable link training\n");
> +                             return;
> +                     }
> +
> +                     /* clear the flag as we are not reusing train set */
> +                     intel_dp->link_trained = false;

Do this first in case we bail out in the above error handling.

> +                     continue;
> +             }
> +
>               /* Check to see if we've tried the max voltage */
>               for (i = 0; i < intel_dp->lane_count; i++)
>                       if ((intel_dp->train_set[i] & 
> DP_TRAIN_MAX_SWING_REACHED) == 0)
> @@ -3475,6 +3526,7 @@ intel_dp_complete_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>               /* Make sure clock is still ok */
>               if (!drm_dp_clock_recovery_ok(link_status, 
> intel_dp->lane_count)) {
> +                     intel_dp->link_trained = false;
>                       intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
>                       intel_dp_set_link_train(intel_dp, &DP,
>                                               training_pattern |
> @@ -3490,6 +3542,7 @@ intel_dp_complete_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>               /* Try 5 times, then try clock recovery if that fails */
>               if (tries > 5) {
> +                     intel_dp->link_trained = false;
>                       intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
>                       intel_dp_set_link_train(intel_dp, &DP,
>                                               training_pattern |
> @@ -3511,8 +3564,10 @@ intel_dp_complete_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>       intel_dp->DP = DP;
>  
> -     if (channel_eq)
> +     if (channel_eq) {
>               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Channel EQ done. DP Training successful\n");
> +             intel_dp->link_trained = is_edp(intel_dp);
> +     }
>  
>  }
>  
> @@ -4450,6 +4505,8 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port 
> *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
>       intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, power_domain);
>  
>       if (long_hpd) {
> +             /* indicate that we need to restart link training */
> +             intel_dp->link_trained = false;
>  
>               if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
>                       if (!ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, 
> intel_dig_port))
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 632df1c..f1e1318 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -668,6 +668,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
>                                    bool has_aux_irq,
>                                    int send_bytes,
>                                    uint32_t aux_clock_divider);
> +     bool link_trained;
>  };
>  
>  struct intel_digital_port {
> -- 
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to