Though we don't have precise tracking for when buffers in the cache list become idle (we don't have request tracking at this layer), we do have some basic assumptions that the head is inactive and the tail active. So when inserting buffers in the cache, it would be good not to completely ignore those assumptions.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> --- intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c index 61a248f..2cbe973 100644 --- a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c +++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c @@ -1329,7 +1329,10 @@ drm_intel_gem_bo_unreference_final(drm_intel_bo *bo, time_t time) bo_gem->name = NULL; bo_gem->validate_index = -1; - DRMLISTADDTAIL(&bo_gem->head, &bucket->head); + if (drm_intel_gem_bo_busy(&bo_gem->bo)) + DRMLISTADDTAIL(&bo_gem->head, &bucket->head); + else + DRMLISTADD(&bo_gem->head, &bucket->head); } else { drm_intel_gem_bo_free(bo); } -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
