Hi,
On 07/01/2015 10:25 AM, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
From: Ankitprasad Sharma <ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com>
This patch adds support for clearing buffer objects via blitter
engines. This is particularly useful for clearing out the memory
from stolen region.
Because CPU cannot access it? I would put that into the commit message
since I think cover letter does not go into the git history.
v2: Add support for using execlists & PPGTT
v3: Fix issues in legacy ringbuffer submission mode
v4: Rebased to the latest drm-intel-nightly (Ankit)
testcase: igt/gem_stolen
Nitpick: usually it is "Testcase:" and all tags grouped together.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankitprasad Sharma <ankitprasad.r.sharma at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_exec.c | 201 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h | 3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 1 +
7 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_exec.c
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
index de21965..1959314 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ i915-y += i915_cmd_parser.o \
i915_gem_debug.o \
i915_gem_dmabuf.o \
i915_gem_evict.o \
+ i915_gem_exec.o \
i915_gem_execbuffer.o \
i915_gem_gtt.o \
i915_gem.o \
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index ea9caf2..d1e151e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -3082,6 +3082,10 @@ int __must_check i915_gem_evict_something(struct
drm_device *dev,
int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm, bool do_idle);
int i915_gem_evict_everything(struct drm_device *dev);
+/* i915_gem_exec.c */
+int i915_gem_exec_clear_object(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+ struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv);
+
/* belongs in i915_gem_gtt.h */
static inline void i915_gem_chipset_flush(struct drm_device *dev)
{
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_exec.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_exec.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a07fda0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_exec.c
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright © 2013 Intel Corporation
Is the year correct?
+ *
+ * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
+ * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
+ * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
+ * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
+ * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
+ * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+ *
+ * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
+ * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
+ * Software.
+ *
+ * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+ * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
+ * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+ * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
+ * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
+ * IN THE SOFTWARE.
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
And author?
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <drm/drmP.h>
+#include <drm/i915_drm.h>
+#include "i915_drv.h"
+
+#define GEN8_COLOR_BLT_CMD (2<<29 | 0x50<<22)
+
+#define BPP_8 0
+#define BPP_16 (1<<24)
+#define BPP_32 (1<<25 | 1<<24)
+
+#define ROP_FILL_COPY (0xf0 << 16)
+
+static int i915_gem_exec_flush_object(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+ struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
+ struct intel_context *ctx,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_request **req)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = i915_gem_object_sync(obj, ring, req);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (obj->base.write_domain & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU) {
+ if (i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, false))
+ i915_gem_chipset_flush(obj->base.dev);
+ obj->base.write_domain &= ~I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU;
+ }
+ if (obj->base.write_domain & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT) {
+ wmb();
+ obj->base.write_domain &= ~I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT;
+ }
All this could be replaced with i915_gem_object_set_to_gtt_domain, no?
+
+ return i915.enable_execlists ?
+ logical_ring_invalidate_all_caches(*req) :
+ intel_ring_invalidate_all_caches(*req);
And this is done on actual submission for you by the lower levels so you
don't need to call it directly.
+}
+
+static void i915_gem_exec_dirty_object(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+ struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
+ struct i915_address_space *vm,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
+{
+ i915_gem_request_assign(&obj->last_write_req, req);
+ obj->base.read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER;
+ obj->base.write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER;
+ i915_vma_move_to_active(i915_gem_obj_to_vma(obj, vm), req);
+ obj->dirty = 1;
+
+ ring->gpu_caches_dirty = true;
+}
+
+int i915_gem_exec_clear_object(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+ struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv)
+{
Function needs some good kerneldoc.
+ struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+ struct intel_engine_cs *ring;
+ struct intel_context *ctx;
+ struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf;
+ struct i915_address_space *vm;
+ struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&dev->struct_mutex);
It think there was some guidance that lockdep_assert_held is compiled
out when lockdep is not in the kernel and that WARN_ON is preferred. In
this case that would probably be WARN_ON_ONCE and return error.
+
+ ring = &dev_priv->ring[HAS_BLT(dev) ? BCS : RCS];
+ ctx = i915_gem_context_get(file_priv, DEFAULT_CONTEXT_HANDLE);
+ /* Allocate a request for this operation nice and early. */
+ ret = i915_gem_request_alloc(ring, ctx, &req);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (ctx->ppgtt)
+ vm = &ctx->ppgtt->base;
+ else
+ vm = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
+
+ if (i915.enable_execlists && !ctx->engine[ring->id].state) {
+ ret = intel_lr_context_deferred_create(ctx, ring);
i915_gem_context_get above and this call are very similar to what
i915_gem_validate_context does. It seems to me it would be better to
call the latter function here.
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
Failure path (and some below) leaks the request. i915_gem_request_cancel
is the new API to be called I understand.
+ }
+
+ ringbuf = ctx->engine[ring->id].ringbuf;
+
+ ret = i915_gem_object_pin(obj, vm, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (obj->tiling_mode && INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen <= 3) {
+ ret = i915_gem_object_put_fence(obj);
+ if (ret)
+ goto unpin;
+ }
Why is this needed?
Could it be called unconditionally and still work?
At least I would recommend a comment explaining it.
+ ret = i915_gem_exec_flush_object(obj, ring, ctx, &req);
+ if (ret)
+ goto unpin;
As I said above one call to i915_gem_object_set_to_gtt_domain would be
enough I think.
+ if (i915.enable_execlists) {
+ if (dev_priv->info.gen >= 8) {
+ ret = intel_logical_ring_begin(req, 8);
+ if (ret)
+ goto unpin;
+
+ intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, GEN8_COLOR_BLT_CMD |
+ BLT_WRITE_RGBA |
+ (7-2));
+ intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, BPP_32 |
+ ROP_FILL_COPY |
+ PAGE_SIZE);
+ intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, 0);
+ intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf,
+ obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT
+ << 16 | PAGE_SIZE / 4);
+ intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf,
+ i915_gem_obj_offset(obj, vm));
+ intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, 0);
+ intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, 0);
+ intel_logical_ring_emit(ringbuf, MI_NOOP);
+
+ intel_logical_ring_advance(ringbuf);
+ } else {
+ DRM_ERROR("Execlists not supported for gen %d\n",
+ dev_priv->info.gen);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
I would put a WARN_ON_ONCE here, or even just return -EINVAL. If the
driver is so messed up in general that execlists are enabled < gen8 I
think there is no point logging errors about it from here. Would also
save you one indentation level.
+ goto unpin;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (IS_GEN8(dev)) {
+ ret = intel_ring_begin(req, 8);
+ if (ret)
+ goto unpin;
+
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, GEN8_COLOR_BLT_CMD |
+ BLT_WRITE_RGBA | (7-2));
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, BPP_32 |
+ ROP_FILL_COPY | PAGE_SIZE);
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
+ intel_ring_emit(ring,
+ obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT << 16 |
+ PAGE_SIZE / 4);
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, i915_gem_obj_offset(obj, vm));
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
Such a pitty that these two emit blocks need to be duplicated but I
guess it is what it is now.
+ } else {
+ ret = intel_ring_begin(req, 6);
+ if (ret)
+ goto unpin;
+
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, COLOR_BLT_CMD |
+ BLT_WRITE_RGBA);
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, BPP_32 |
+ ROP_FILL_COPY | PAGE_SIZE);
+ intel_ring_emit(ring,
+ obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT << 16 |
+ PAGE_SIZE);
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, i915_gem_obj_offset(obj, vm));
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, 0);
+ intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
+ }
+
+ __intel_ring_advance(ring);
+ }
+
+ i915_gem_exec_dirty_object(obj, ring, vm, req);
Where is this request actually submitted?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
