On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:47:25AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > It's completely unused and there's really no reason for this:
> > - drm_framebuffer structures are invariant after creation, no need for
> > helpers to manipulate them.
> > - drm_framebuffer structures should just be embedded (and that's what
> > all the drivers do).
> >
> > Stumbled over this since some folks are apparently concerned with the
> > overhead of struct drm_framebuffer and this is an easy 8 byte saving.
> >
> > More could be gained by ditching the legacy fields and recomputing
> > stuff from the fourcc value. But that would require some drm-wide
> > cocci and real justification.
> >
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <[email protected]>
Thanks for the review, patch applied to drm-misc.
-Daniel
>
> Thanks
> David
>
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> > index 75f49c1ef8bb..c0366e9152e2 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> > @@ -210,8 +210,6 @@ struct drm_framebuffer {
> > int flags;
> > uint32_t pixel_format; /* fourcc format */
> > struct list_head filp_head;
> > - /* if you are using the helper */
> > - void *helper_private;
> > };
> >
> > struct drm_property_blob {
> > --
> > 2.5.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
