Cc: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <[email protected]>
---
Paulo, I'm not positive that this is the cause of the issues you're seeing, but
I did find this unwanted behavior change while re-reading all the SKL watermark
code.  Could you give this a try and see if it improves your situation at all?

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 3857592..22c97f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2951,6 +2951,9 @@ skl_get_total_relative_data_rate(const struct 
intel_crtc_state *cstate)
                if (pstate->fb == NULL)
                        continue;
 
+               if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR)
+                       continue;
+
                /* packed/uv */
                total_data_rate += skl_plane_relative_data_rate(cstate,
                                                                pstate,
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to