On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:55:53PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> 
> LPT/WPT only have transcoder A, so we shouldn't look at FIFO underruns
> for transocoder B/C. And more importnatnly we should not consider
> the state of underrun reporting for transcoders B/C when checking
> whether we can enable the south error interrupt.
> 
> The whole thing is a bit of mess since we store the underrun reporting
> state for transcoder A under intel_crtc for pipe A, irrespective of
> which pipe may actually be driving the transcoder. But I figured trying
> to change that would result in more churn.
> 
> Caveat: Still untested
> 
> v2: Use HAS_PCH_LPT_H instead of HAS_DDI
>     Use cpt_check_pch_fifo_underruns() on LPT-H/WPT-H too
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

I've battled hsw lpt fifo underrun issues last week and never seen a fifo
underrun on pipe B/C. Have you seen them anywhere really?

If not I think we can skip this patch here, since I think I tracked it all
down.
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
> index bda526660e20..3d3acc8b8367 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,14 @@
>   * The code also supports underrun detection on the PCH transcoder.
>   */
>  
> +static bool cpt_transcoder_exists(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +                               enum transcoder pch_transcoder)
> +{
> +     /* LPT-H/WPT-H have only transcoder A */
> +     return HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv) ||
> +             (HAS_PCH_LPT_H(dev_priv) && pch_transcoder == TRANSCODER_A);
> +}
> +
>  static bool ivb_can_enable_err_int(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> @@ -69,13 +77,16 @@ static bool ivb_can_enable_err_int(struct drm_device *dev)
>  static bool cpt_can_enable_serr_int(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -     enum pipe pipe;
> -     struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> +     enum transcoder pch_transcoder;
>  
>       assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>  
> -     for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> -             crtc = to_intel_crtc(dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe]);
> +     for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pch_transcoder) {
> +             struct intel_crtc *crtc =
> +                     
> to_intel_crtc(dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pch_transcoder]);
> +
> +             if (!cpt_transcoder_exists(dev_priv, pch_transcoder))
> +                     continue;
>  
>               if (crtc->pch_fifo_underrun_disabled)
>                       return false;
> @@ -206,6 +217,9 @@ static void cpt_check_pch_fifo_underruns(struct 
> intel_crtc *crtc)
>  
>       assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>  
> +     if (!cpt_transcoder_exists(dev_priv, pch_transcoder))
> +             return;
> +
>       if ((serr_int & SERR_INT_TRANS_FIFO_UNDERRUN(pch_transcoder)) == 0)
>               return;
>  
> @@ -222,6 +236,9 @@ static void cpt_set_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct 
> drm_device *dev,
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>  
> +     if (!cpt_transcoder_exists(dev_priv, pch_transcoder))
> +             return;
> +
>       if (enable) {
>               I915_WRITE(SERR_INT,
>                          SERR_INT_TRANS_FIFO_UNDERRUN(pch_transcoder));
> @@ -436,7 +453,7 @@ void intel_check_pch_fifo_underruns(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>               if (crtc->pch_fifo_underrun_disabled)
>                       continue;
>  
> -             if (HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv))
> +             if (HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_LPT_H(dev_priv))
>                       cpt_check_pch_fifo_underruns(crtc);
>       }
>  
> -- 
> 2.4.10
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to