By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index cf93bb2a2ac3..fc0794de595b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -1598,7 +1598,9 @@ static void _chv_enable_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
        I915_WRITE(DPLL(pipe), pipe_config->dpll_hw_state.dpll);
 
        /* Check PLL is locked */
-       if (wait_for(((I915_READ(DPLL(pipe)) & DPLL_LOCK_VLV) == 
DPLL_LOCK_VLV), 1))
+       if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
+                                   DPLL(pipe), DPLL_LOCK_VLV, DPLL_LOCK_VLV,
+                                   1))
                DRM_ERROR("PLL %d failed to lock\n", pipe);
 }
 
-- 
2.8.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to