From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>

At the moment HAS_GUC_UCODE == HAS_GUC == IS_GEN9 ==
(INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen_mask & BIT(8)), which is true but not one. And
module parameters are integers and not booleans so compiler will not
normalize the value for us.

Quick and easy fix for the GuC loading code and the whole area can
be evaluated afterwards.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Gordon <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
index d925e2daeb24..72ea5b97e242 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
@@ -687,9 +687,9 @@ void intel_guc_init(struct drm_device *dev)
 
        /* A negative value means "use platform default" */
        if (i915.enable_guc_loading < 0)
-               i915.enable_guc_loading = HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev);
+               i915.enable_guc_loading = !!HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev);
        if (i915.enable_guc_submission < 0)
-               i915.enable_guc_submission = HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev);
+               i915.enable_guc_submission = !!HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev);
 
        if (!HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev)) {
                fw_path = NULL;
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to