Move the single line to the callsite as the name is now misleading, and
the purpose is solely to add the request to the execution queue.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 9 +--------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 0593ea3ba211..63984c4d8e5a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1211,13 +1211,6 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_move_to_active(struct list_head 
*vmas,
        }
 }
 
-static void
-i915_gem_execbuffer_retire_commands(struct i915_execbuffer_params *params)
-{
-       /* Add a breadcrumb for the completion of the batch buffer */
-       __i915_add_request(params->request, params->batch_obj, true);
-}
-
 static int
 i915_reset_gen7_sol_offsets(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
 {
@@ -1692,7 +1685,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 
        ret = execbuf_submit(params, args, &eb->vmas);
 err_request:
-       i915_gem_execbuffer_retire_commands(params);
+       __i915_add_request(params->request, params->batch_obj, ret == 0);
 
 err_batch_unpin:
        /*
-- 
2.8.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to