Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a timeout of 0 becomes reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(), we do not need to handle such conversion in the caller. The only challenge are those callers that wish to differentiate the error code between the nonblocking busy check and potentially blocking wait.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Ben Skeggs <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 21 +++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c index 72e2399bce39..b90e21ff1ed8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c @@ -861,6 +861,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct nouveau_bo *nvbo; bool no_wait = !!(req->flags & NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP_NOWAIT); bool write = !!(req->flags & NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP_WRITE); + long lret; int ret; gem = drm_gem_object_lookup(file_priv, req->handle); @@ -868,19 +869,15 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, return -ENOENT; nvbo = nouveau_gem_object(gem); - if (no_wait) - ret = reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(nvbo->bo.resv, write) ? 0 : -EBUSY; - else { - long lret; + lret = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(nvbo->bo.resv, write, true, + no_wait ? 0 :30 * HZ); + if (!lret) + ret = -EBUSY; + else if (lret > 0) + ret = 0; + else + ret = lret; - lret = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(nvbo->bo.resv, write, true, 30 * HZ); - if (!lret) - ret = -EBUSY; - else if (lret > 0) - ret = 0; - else - ret = lret; - } nouveau_bo_sync_for_cpu(nvbo); drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(gem); -- 2.9.3 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
