On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 06:08:30PM -0400, robert.f...@collabora.com wrote:
> From: Robert Foss <robert.f...@collabora.com>
> 
> Base functions to help testing the Sync File Framework (explicit fencing
> mechanism ported from Android).
> These functions allow you to create, use and destroy timelines and fences.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.f...@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.pado...@collabora.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <e...@engestrom.ch>
> ---
>  lib/Makefile.sources |   2 +
>  lib/sw_sync.c        | 237 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/sw_sync.h        |  49 +++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 288 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 lib/sw_sync.c
>  create mode 100644 lib/sw_sync.h
> 
> diff --git a/lib/Makefile.sources b/lib/Makefile.sources
> index bac9a7f..3dc7c3c 100644
> --- a/lib/Makefile.sources
> +++ b/lib/Makefile.sources
> @@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ lib_source_list =           \
>       rendercopy_gen8.c       \
>       rendercopy_gen9.c       \
>       rendercopy.h            \
> +     sw_sync.c               \
> +     sw_sync.h               \
>       intel_reg_map.c         \
>       intel_iosf.c            \
>       igt_kms.c               \
> diff --git a/lib/sw_sync.c b/lib/sw_sync.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..179a473
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/sw_sync.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2012 Google, Inc
> + * Copyright © 2016 Collabora, Ltd.
> + *
> + * Based on the implementation from the Android Open Source Project
> + *
> + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
> + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
> + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
> + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
> + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
> + *
> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
> + * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
> + * Software.
> + *
> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
> + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL
> + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
> + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
> + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER 
> DEALINGS
> + * IN THE SOFTWARE.
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + *    Robert Foss <robert.f...@collabora.com>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef ANDROID
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#else
> +#include <libgen.h>
> +#endif
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <poll.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <linux/sync_file.h>
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +
> +#include "sw_sync.h"
> +#include "drmtest.h"
> +#include "ioctl_wrappers.h"
> +
> +#ifndef SW_SYNC_IOC_INC
> +struct sw_sync_create_fence_data {
> +     __u32   value;
> +     char    name[32];
> +     __s32   fence;
> +};
> +
> +#define SW_SYNC_IOC_MAGIC            'W'
> +#define SW_SYNC_IOC_CREATE_FENCE     _IOWR(SW_SYNC_IOC_MAGIC, 0,\
> +                                             struct 
> sw_sync_create_fence_data)
> +#define SW_SYNC_IOC_INC                      _IOW(SW_SYNC_IOC_MAGIC, 1, 
> __u32)
> +#endif
> +
> +#define DEVFS_SW_SYNC   "/dev/sw_sync"
> +#define DEBUGFS_SW_SYNC "/sys/kernel/debug/sync/sw_sync"
> +
> +
> +int sw_sync_fd_is_valid(int fd)
> +{
> +     int status;
> +
> +     if (fd < 0)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     status = fcntl(fd, F_GETFD, 0);
> +     return status >= 0;
> +}
> +
> +static
> +void sw_sync_fd_close(int fd)
> +{
> +     if (!sw_sync_fd_is_valid(fd))
> +             return;
> +
> +     close(fd);

What bug are you trying to prevent? This is the same as just calling
close(fd) and seeing EINVAL.

> +}
> +
> +int sw_sync_timeline_create(void)
> +{
> +     int fd = open(DEVFS_SW_SYNC, O_RDWR);

if (fd < 0)
        fd = open(DEBUGFS_SW_SYNC, O_RDWR);

igt_require(fd >= 0);

> +
> +             fd = open(DEBUGFS_SW_SYNC, O_RDWR);
> +
> +     igt_assert(sw_sync_fd_is_valid(fd));
> +
> +     return fd;
> +}
> +
> +void sw_sync_timeline_destroy(int fd)
> +{
> +     return sw_sync_fd_close(fd);

Now just close(fd); and might as well not obfuscate that these are plain
fd.

> +int sw_sync_fence_create(int fd, int32_t seqno)
> +{
> +     struct sw_sync_create_fence_data data = {};
> +     data.value = seqno;
> +
> +     if (fd >= 0) {
> +             do_ioctl(fd, SW_SYNC_IOC_CREATE_FENCE, &data);
> +             return data.fence;
> +     } else {
> +             do_ioctl_err(fd, SW_SYNC_IOC_CREATE_FENCE, &data, EBADF);
> +             return -1;

Try:

int __sw_sync_fence_create(int fd, int32_t seqno) /* int32_t not unsigned ? */
{

        struct sw_sync_create_fence_data data;

        memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));
        data.value = seqno;

        if (igt_ioctl(fd, SW_SYNC_IOCT_CREATE_FENCE, &data))
                return -errno;
        
        return data.fence;
}

int sw_sync_fence_create(int fd, int32_t seqno)
{
        int fence = __sw_sync_fence_create(fd, seqno);
        igt_assert(fence >= 0);
        return fence;
}

Then only in the test code do you send garbage and check for the
expected errno.



> +     }
> +}
> +
> +void sw_sync_timeline_inc(int fd, uint32_t count)
> +{
> +     uint32_t arg = count;
> +
> +     if (fd == 0 || fd == -1)
> +             return;

What's wrong with fd == 0?

See above. By default assert that we don't fail, then have a function
for negative tests.

> +
> +     do_ioctl(fd, SW_SYNC_IOC_INC, &arg);

Try not to use do_ioctl(), it generates horrible messages from the macro
expansions of the ioctl numbers.

> +}
> +
> +int sw_sync_merge(int fd1, int fd2)
> +{
> +     struct sync_merge_data data = {};
> +     int err;
> +
> +     data.fd2 = fd2;
> +
> +     err = ioctl(fd1, SYNC_IOC_MERGE, &data);
> +     if (err < 0)
> +             return err;

Our convention is to return -errno.

> +
> +     sw_sync_fd_is_valid(data.fence);
> +
> +     return data.fence;
> +}
> +
> +int sw_sync_wait(int fence, int timeout)
> +{
> +     struct pollfd fds;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     fds.fd = fence;
> +     fds.events = POLLIN | POLLERR;
> +
> +     ret = poll(&fds, 1, timeout);
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int sw_sync_fence_size(int fd)
> +{
> +     int count;
> +     struct sync_file_info *info = sync_file_info(fd);
> +
> +     if (!info)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     count = info->num_fences;
> +
> +     sync_file_info_free(info);

Querying all those fences seems like a waste of time now.

sw_sync_fence_count not size.

        struct sync_file_info info;

        memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
        if (ioctl(fd, SYNC_IOC_FILE_INFO, &info))
                return -errno;
        
        return info.num_fences;

> +int sw_sync_fence_count_status(int fd, int status)
> +{
> +     int i, count = 0;
> +     struct sync_fence_info *fence_info = NULL;
> +     struct sync_file_info *info = sync_file_info(fd);
> +
> +     if (!info)
> +             return -1;
> +
> +     fence_info = (struct sync_fence_info *)(uintptr_t)info->sync_fence_info;
> +     for (i = 0 ; i < info->num_fences ; i++) {
> +             if (fence_info[i].status == status)
> +                     count++;
> +     }
> +
> +     sync_file_info_free(info);
> +
> +     return count;
> +}

int __sw_sync_fence_count_status(int fd, int status)
{
        struct sync_file_info info;
        struct sync_fence_info *fence_info;
        int count;

        memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
        if (ioctl(fd, SYNC_IOC_FILE_INFO, &info))
                return -errno;

        fence_info = calloc(info.num_fences, sizeof(*fence_info));
        if (!fence_info)
                return -ENOMEM;
        
        info.fence_info = (uintptr_t)fence_info;
        if (ioctl(fd, SYNC_IOC_FILE_INFO, &info)) {
                count = -errno;
        } else {
                count = 0;
                for (i = 0 ; i < info.num_fences ; i++)
                        count += fence_info[i].status == status;
        }

        free(fence_info);

        return count;
}

int sw_sync_fence_count_status(int fd, int status)
{
        int count = __sw_sync_fence_count_status(fd, status);
        igt_assert(count >= 0);
        return count;
}

So that regular callers don't have to worry about errors.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to