On ke, 2016-09-14 at 07:52 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Since we only use the more generic unlocked variant, just rename it as
> the normal i915_gem_active_wait(). The temporary cost is that we need to
> always acquire the reference in a RCU safe manner, but the benefit is
> that we will combine the common paths.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to