On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Dave Gordon <david.s.gor...@intel.com> wrote:
> On 14/09/16 18:35, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:44:04PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
>>> On ke, 2016-09-14 at 07:52 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>>> -static inline bool
>>>> -i915_gem_object_has_active_engine(const struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>>>> - int engine)
>>>> -{
>>>> - return obj->flags & BIT(engine + I915_BO_ACTIVE_SHIFT);
>>>> + return obj->active_count;
>>>
>>> our type is bool, so !!obj->active_count;
>>
>> That's the beauty of using bool, !! is implied on the (bool)integer
>> conversion.
>> -Chris
>
> It's a gcc extension, though, so does it work on clang?
It's in the standard.
"When any scalar value is converted to _Bool, the result is 0 if the
value compares equal to 0; otherwise, the result is 1."
BR,
Jani.
>
> .Dave.
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
