On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:57:06AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > On to, 2016-09-15 at 16:28 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >> Fix sparse warnings:
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1179:5: warning: symbol
>> >> 'i915_driver_load' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1267:6: warning: symbol
>> >> 'i915_driver_unload' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:2444:25: warning: symbol 'i915_pm_ops'
>> >> was not declared. Should it be static?
>> > Hmm, Chris, were not these change in the middle of a series, did the
>> > cleanup patches just fall off?
>> Can we just please use whichever patches that fix the issue?
> It was deliberate placement to avoid having those symbols exposed to
> every user of i915_drv.h, i.e. everyone. Limit i915_drv.h to the
> interface exposed by i915_drv.c and so used only by a handful of files.
I can see that, but I prefer to get the warnings gone.
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel-gfx mailing list