On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:57:06AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On to, 2016-09-15 at 16:28 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> Fix sparse warnings:
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1179:5: warning: symbol
> >> 'i915_driver_load' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1267:6: warning: symbol
> >> 'i915_driver_unload' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:2444:25: warning: symbol 'i915_pm_ops'
> >> was not declared. Should it be static?
> > Hmm, Chris, were not these change in the middle of a series, did the
> > cleanup patches just fall off?
> Can we just please use whichever patches that fix the issue?
It was deliberate placement to avoid having those symbols exposed to
every user of i915_drv.h, i.e. everyone. Limit i915_drv.h to the
interface exposed by i915_drv.c and so used only by a handful of files.
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Intel-gfx mailing list