i think windows isn't using the FULL texture memory too (Total texture memory is 256...and the available is 218) so windows is only using 38 :S damn!!!! and Espi..abt that L2 cache...*n00b question* ur saying that, if windows took FULL advantage of the L2 cache..would that mean more performance to the CPU or GPU side?
On Apr 23, 8:51 pm, hussam aulaian <[email protected]> wrote: > no by default xp sees the full L2 cache , thats what i read SP2 has fixed > and > even if u tell the windows that u hav L2 cache , it wont use it fully , its > the lack of the software always.... > > and i still dont get ur point , 218 texture memory available , what could > we do for that? > > -- > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > Subscription > settings:http://groups.google.com/group/intel9x-gaming/subscribe?hl=en -- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
