Yeah, then we would have to go to all branches of 940 ;P Btw, did you read my post about the "ultimate" windows? :) I found a windows 7 embedded, similar to windows fundamentals. Check it out, you have some experience around that so maybe you could make something out of it.
On Jun 25, 4:43 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm I don't know if I agree with the 945GSE chipset being the most > limited... it could be worse... like the i940 chipset lol > > Also gmabooster in my testing didn't work under any OS. That's not to > say it doesn't work with other hardware though, maybe mine's one of > the unlucky computers not to work at all with it. > > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:10 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > To tell the truth I wouldn't spend much on premium rams as the base > > chipset won't take advantage of it. 945GSE is the most limited > > chipset, not supporting dual channel nor dimms faster than 533. The > > important thing would be to have all modules of the same size and > > brand if possible, as to diminish any chance for instability. And > > lower latency is only worth if the difference between regular and > > lower latency rams is small, as the speed difference is quite small as > > well. > > > RD ram could be great, faster than anything else, but they didn' solve > > the too high latency issues paired with a high manufacturing cost. > > It's funny though that you see RD ram at speeds at least 2000MHz on > > the PS3 :) > > Your ram was working at the right speed, you forgot to multiply the > > value. > > > On Jun 25, 12:01 am, hussam aulaian <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You are welcome , > >> im must say , that im no expert in rams , but a ram would be faster not > >> only > >> by how many MHz > >> as the Latency is the main factor of the ram cuz i do remember someone > >> telling me > >> there was a time when a type of ram was there called " RD ram" and it was > >> alot faster than SD rams > >> but for some reason they stopped manufacturing it > > >> and there alot of diff , between 667Mhz and 800 MHz , im sure u will notice > >> diff > >> but as of my experience , i never got whtever Desktop or laptop to work at > >> its max speed > >> my old hp laptop had 667Mhz rams but it worked at 333MHz!!! , i dont knw > >> why > >> , maybe bcuz of Dual Channel mode > >> now my new laptop has 1066MHz ram speed but only running on 533MHz , maybe > >> also bcuz of Dual channel mode > >> but a frnd of mine told me that there is no manufacturer was able to get > >> the > >> full potential out of things , when it comes to laptops > > > -- > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > Espionage724 Has A Signature... -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
