Again, 10fps isn't playable for any game, not to mention that tiny
resolution you're mentioning. You should learn what you need and what
you don't regarding services so you don't use additional software that
just isn't worth it's filesize.
If swiftshader was rewrote from the ground and had, lets say, a 500%
performance increase, then perhaps it would be worthy. But since none
of us have computers with 24 cores then I don't really think single
digit fps are worth the hassle.

On Jun 27, 4:51 am, gma3100 <[email protected]> wrote:
> lolz but i remember alpha 1 gave bad fps some say
> i have no idea cos i dun have win7 XD
> lolz for me having bad fps in a game is no problem most of the time
> for me its just that the game cant run
> recomandded:640x480 all low With Game booster Game accelerator and
> gaming profile and off all unnecessary services
> all of this got me at least 10 fps average on cod4 on swiftshader XD
>
> On Jun 26, 7:52 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > It has some optional levels that only run on true physx hardware.
> > Think of it like assassins creed, crysis, and the likes, meaning just
> > another game gma 950 won't play.
>
> > On Jun 26, 3:21 pm, hussam aulaian <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > GHost Recon advanced warfighter needs an external Phyx card as i remember
> > > reading abt it in 2005
> > > as we tried running it on Desktop with AMD Athlon 64 3000+
> > > with and ASUS MB and XFX Nvidia Geforce 6600 GT
> > > it ran at medium settings with 30+ FPS- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to