Lolz so if mx440 had shaders it could run team fortress 2 at say medium on 640x480??? So if lets say someone could invent cpu shaders but mx440 did the rest it could work better??Wow someone should really invent that
On Jun 27, 9:30 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Get your facts straight. A geforce 4 mx440 beats the crap out of a > fx5200 in every possible way, except shaders because it doesn't > support them. and both fx5600 and 5700 were the true fails of the fx > series. fx5900 had acceptable performance and fx5500 was a good > replacement for the 5200. > > On Jun 27, 5:19 pm, lolattheotherguy <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > lol yea comparing an fx to an mx.... > > mx was like a budget solution, but imo a huge FAIL. I'm glad i never > > had one. I still run a desktop with an fx5600 and its quite decent for > > its price (well was, a long time ago). > > in a far fetched opinion mx is more like a celeron if you really want > > to compare it to something. in other words its just crap. > > > On Jun 27, 4:13 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You ever had a geforce 4 or fx? While geforce 2 and 4 mx were just > > > rebrands, fx was a different series, and while fx5200 had pixel shader > > > 2.0b, it had lower clocks than geforce 4, so if you were playing non > > > shaded games, they would run faster with the geforce 4. If you're > > > looking for an agp card, go for a geforce 7300 or 7600, both are cheap > > > and if you can find a 7600 at good price, go for it. > > > > On Jun 27, 3:05 pm, gma3100 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > hmm but i swore i played counter strike source on geforce 4 mx and my > > > > old pentium 4 ahh good times gooood times > > > > wow ure right i saw on wikipedia now thats weird hmm > > > > ok but i saw on youtube that episode 2 could run full speed on > > > > geforce fx 5200 which is almost the same cept of dx9 support..which > > > > sucks > > > > what about team fortress 2... and they are selling fx 5500 for at > > > > least 32.50 usd in singapore which is 65 singapore dollars > > > > and yes for me as long as its 10 fps it'll go im not the fussy kind of > > > > gamer but as long as the game is good > > > > > On Jun 27, 6:28 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I get you wanting to play it at any cost, and that's why you run it > > > > > entirely on the cpu. > > > > > And geforce 4 mx does not have any shaders, only ti series. > > > > > > On Jun 27, 11:28 am, gma3100 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > No no 3danalyse is for games that give you something like"Hardware > > > > > > does not support shader pixel 2.0b/a Application closing" or to > > > > > > increase performance > > > > > > dude u should have read the last part "tf2 cept... BSOD XD" I get a > > > > > > bsod that says something about gma dlls > > > > > > So i know its the graphics card so i turn to swiftshader to get at > > > > > > least 20 fps.and btw there is no graphical glitches > > > > > > cept i get 20 fps at freaking all low with fps config and dx 8.0 > > > > > > Lolz > > > > > > Cpus are awesome :) > > > > > > and btw team fortress 2 could run on a geforce 4 mx it requires > > > > > > shader > > > > > > pixel 1.1 which even 2003/2004 hardware has > > > > > > so gma 900 all the way to Intel hd graphics could run this game its > > > > > > just that some lazy intel(I said intel not modders)workers dont care > > > > > > about their customers and dun code properly...But well I think win7 > > > > > > could fix this too bad now swiftshader doesnt work cos it gives me > > > > > > the > > > > > > old"The memory could not be read"error.Dumb updates. > > > > > > > On Jun 26, 9:14 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Listen, if a game doesn't run because it lacks a certain hardware > > > > > > > feature then you emulate it through 3danalyze or any other > > > > > > > software > > > > > > > that does the trick, but if you have a game that may have or not > > > > > > > graphical glitches and runs at 20fps, you certainly won't run it > > > > > > > through swiftshader just so you can look at a pretty slideshow of > > > > > > > 1fps. If you can run a game at 60fps then you would never even > > > > > > > touch > > > > > > > it with swiftshader, you would be much better served with > > > > > > > 3danalyze. > > > > > > > > On Jun 27, 5:10 am, gma3100 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > well im not asking you to use swiftshader on a game that well > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > already work on the gma 950 > > > > > > > > but the others are what i always do when i get low fps > > > > > > > > with those methods i managed to get tf2 running on swiftshader > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > 20fps average > > > > > > > > but now without swiftshader i get like 60 fps average at all > > > > > > > > low on > > > > > > > > tf2 cept... > > > > > > > > BSOD XD > > > > > > > > > On Jun 26, 9:04 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Again, 10fps isn't playable for any game, not to mention that > > > > > > > > > tiny > > > > > > > > > resolution you're mentioning. You should learn what you need > > > > > > > > > and what > > > > > > > > > you don't regarding services so you don't use additional > > > > > > > > > software that > > > > > > > > > just isn't worth it's filesize. > > > > > > > > > If swiftshader was rewrote from the ground and had, lets say, > > > > > > > > > a 500% > > > > > > > > > performance increase, then perhaps it would be worthy. But > > > > > > > > > since none > > > > > > > > > of us have computers with 24 cores then I don't really think > > > > > > > > > single > > > > > > > > > digit fps are worth the hassle. > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 27, 4:51 am, gma3100 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > lolz but i remember alpha 1 gave bad fps some say > > > > > > > > > > i have no idea cos i dun have win7 XD > > > > > > > > > > lolz for me having bad fps in a game is no problem most of > > > > > > > > > > the time > > > > > > > > > > for me its just that the game cant run > > > > > > > > > > recomandded:640x480 all low With Game booster Game > > > > > > > > > > accelerator and > > > > > > > > > > gaming profile and off all unnecessary services > > > > > > > > > > all of this got me at least 10 fps average on cod4 on > > > > > > > > > > swiftshader XD > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 26, 7:52 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > It has some optional levels that only run on true physx > > > > > > > > > > > hardware. > > > > > > > > > > > Think of it like assassins creed, crysis, and the likes, > > > > > > > > > > > meaning just > > > > > > > > > > > another game gma 950 won't play. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 26, 3:21 pm, hussam aulaian <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > GHost Recon advanced warfighter needs an external Phyx > > > > > > > > > > > > card as i remember > > > > > > > > > > > > reading abt it in 2005 > > > > > > > > > > > > as we tried running it on Desktop with AMD Athlon 64 > > > > > > > > > > > > 3000+ > > > > > > > > > > > > with and ASUS MB and XFX Nvidia Geforce 6600 GT > > > > > > > > > > > > it ran at medium settings with 30+ FPS- Hide quoted > > > > > > > > > > > > text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
