hey all, @uncleferassi lol, yeah, i do plan for a future release of V2.0, i have to consider that the V2.0 should combined with other modders work, meaning a co-op driver, the V2.0..but that aside, it's a future plans...
@ everyone.. lol, too much debate, i cant point out who to point to ^^ imo x64 have it's good side and bad side...it depends on the users him/herself...as for me, i prefer 32bit system with PAE..^^ also yes, i have been working for the 64bit V1.2 drivers...mind that i cant test it myself as i dont have any 64-bit system...so result may vary... V2.0 will also available for both 32 and 64 bit... V1.1E will not having a 64bit version...^^ On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:32 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Exactly. All systems with 4GB and above should go for x64 as it also > increased the max allocated memory for single apps, and for > productivity it is also helpful. But I know of many powerful systems > with 4GB in which 1GB is sacrificed so they get the added performance > of x86. > > On Aug 6, 5:18 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > I only use x64 Windows 7 on my new laptop because of UEFI support > > (semi-instant boot), but other then that, I use Win7 Pro x86. > > > > x64 is only useful IMO if you have more then 4GB of memory, other then > > that, your talking all x86 apps running in an emulation layer, and > > less compatibility, and your talking more HDD/mem usage when compared > > to a x86 OS. Oh and since x64 doesn't have an easy way of disabling > > driver signature enforcement, imagine having to press F8 on boot each > > time just so these modded drivers load (theres other means like a > > 3rd-party boot loader, but that would probably disable activation > > means like Windows Loader 1.9 and etc, but not RemoveWAT). > > > > I personally saw no game run any better on a x64 OS then a x86 OS also. > > > > Not really trying to dis x64 OS's, but unless you have more then 4GB > > of RAM or a mobo with UEFI support, theres no real use IMO > > > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:27 AM, lolattheotherguy > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > @tribal: This is exactly what keeps things behind. Everyone should go > > > x64 as all new processors are capable of it. People with x64 ready > > > machines decide to go 32bit coz of the lack of support. It all has to > > > turn around. > > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > -- > > Acer TravelMate 2480 > > GFX: GMA950 CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz RAM: 2GB DDR2 333Mhz > > HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- Laptop: Acer Aspire Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz Intel GMA 950 IGP Intel 945 Chipset 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 80GB standard PATA HDD Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
