im very grateful for the great news ^^
as i said before the driver will give out full eye candy according to game
setting..but performance may vary...
also i never thought that the driver can improve performance on newer (2010)
game engine...
i'll keep this in mind and if can i make a final version which will be
optimize for newer game engine also...

thanks again for ur support elbertzai ^^ (ps : uve been inactive lately, i
often visit to ur blog and theres no news..)

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Espionage724 <[email protected]>wrote:

> I was able to get like 20FPS with XP drivers, on 7 it was far lower.
> my CPU is probably the culprit here though, single core 1.6Ghz
>
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:37 AM, ElbErtZaI <[email protected]> wrote:
> > dang..even if all is set to lowest, it's still laggy in skirmish
> > battles, even in 1vs1..i rmb there's a time one of the beta patch
> > gives FPS boost alot while maintaining the eye candy graphics, tat's
> > when 1280x600 resolution was available. dang..if only that internal
> > setting config can be brought back and apply to current game file..
> > I think 950GMA cant even handle the shadow setting, but they're kind
> > enuf to just put blobs shadow rather than none
> >
> > On Aug 13, 1:58 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On my Radeon HD 3200 I can do everything high except Shaders,
> >> Lighting, and Shadows (shaders is what kills FPS, and when its low,
> >> the other 2 go low).
> >>
> >> If I enable Shadows from the varaibles file, perfomance hit is little to
> none.
> >>
> >> On my 950GMA, Terran made a huge FPS I noticed in the beta.
> >>
> >> But yea IMO, physics (which doesnt make a difference on my fps at all)
> >> and 3d portraits make the biggest difference and should be enabled no
> >> matter what :p
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:21 AM, ElbErtZaI <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > Hey guyz, Long time no see
> >> > I've played finish the campaign of Starcraft 2 (setting was all low
> >> > but the model and movie detail is high, 3D portrait (it's a must when
> >> > play in campaign), and reflection turn on)
> >> > some mission were a horror because of the FPS hit in some part
> >> > (2-7fps) but nevertheless, i was able to play finish all the mission
> >> > ( and i mean all 29/29 including the secret and protoss mission)
> >> > The Skirmish performance was quite ookay i guess but still massive FPS
> >> > hit when there's many thing going on especially when playing as
> >> > protoss (when u're building many phylon)
> >> > I was using the '9xx Soldiers sans frontiers Alpha1' modded driver
> >>
> >> > Now im using 'V1.2 Ultimate Graphics "Sherry" Alpha' modded driver and
> >> > i've notice some graphical eye candy gain, the Protoss's Nexus
> >> > building finally has glow effect when u build probes O.O! im not sure
> >> > whether there's performance gain or not, but it's still laggy and
> >> > slowdowns alot when there's alot happening.
> >>
> >> > P.S. I'm stil tweaking the variable.txt config to provide both nice
> >> > performance while maintain that eye candy graphics.
> >> > P.S. I'm a starcraft fanatic since brood war expansion release way way
> >> > back
> >> > P.S. I found that AngelicTears laptop spec is same as mine 100%
> >> > similiar (except my ram is 1GB DDR2 kingston x2) o___o
> >>
> >> > --
> >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
> >>
> >> --
> >> Acer TravelMate 2480
> >> GFX: GMA950   CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz   RAM: 2GB DDR2 333Mhz
> >>   HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA
> >
> > --
> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Acer TravelMate 2480
> GFX: GMA950   CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz   RAM: 2GB DDR2 333Mhz
>   HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA
>
> --
> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>



-- 
Laptop:
Acer Aspire
Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz
Intel GMA 950 IGP
Intel 945 Chipset
1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2
80GB standard PATA HDD
Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to