lol, isnt infamous means superbly famous?? man i forgetting my english more and more...dammit...
or i just being sarcastic...lol...yeah, win98Se is the best OS ever and that's hands down...nuff said.. :) On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:18 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Why infamous, Angelic? Win98se was one of the best OSes I ever used, I > dual booted it with win2000, and it rocked. That particular OS booted > a computer in 4 secs, so it's no joke :) > > Btw Namige, I only read your first comment on this thread, and big LOL > to you, macbook air? Pffft. Real computers are the ones that stand on > the floor or desk, not something that fits into an A4 envelope :)) > When they can fit smp and sli systems into that form factor, then > we'll talk again, but until then, desktops ftw! > > On Oct 28, 9:14 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > @tribaljet > > yeah, i do like the fact that motion control will be mainstream but not > with > > the Move and Kinect.. > > i imagine a full control of a game with just our mind..lol, not like the > > matrix where u die in a virtual world, same with ur reality...the kind > that > > im imagining are full game control just with mind, no more analog > > calibration and key change..just think and u can do it in games, imagine > > playing CoD:MW2 that feels like ur holding a real gun, minus the pain of > > having a bullet in your head...that would pawns..and i do hoping that > tech > > will arise for consumer use.. > > > > @namige > > tell me about it, i have tested my dad's celeron long ago and the only Os > > that lag free on it was the infamous win98SE...lol > > > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Namige <[email protected]> wrote: > > > i remember having a northwood celeron @ 2.8ghz... it ALWAYS lagged in > > > windows xp not matter what I did, reinstalling windows, optimising, or > > > even adding 1GB of ram. I comtemplated suicide after using the damn > > > machine for more than 5 minutes > > > > > On Oct 28, 9:06 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > lol, sure..^^ > > > > yeah, touch screens do have its pleasurable effects, i also do love > it, > > > > despite the glossy screens and oily hands sometimes...lol...i still > like > > > > touch...but for work or heavy usage such as gaming, i cant see where > the > > > > touch could fit...then again, its still ok for a game in touch > screens > > > then > > > > those Xbox Kinect and PS3 Move...those just gay imo ..lol.. > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:02 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Well, it's like what I told you about that futuristic tech vid, > > > > > physical keyboards are the best tactile experience, no matter how > good > > > > > touch interfaces get. I'm going to look into a couple netbook > models a > > > > > friend told me about, ones that aren't so laughable in terms of > > > > > performance, and I'll get back to you on that. > > > > > > > On Oct 28, 8:58 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > haha, yeah, ive been thinking about tablets too, but i still > prefer > > > hard > > > > > > keyboard, for long typing... > > > > > > but saying that, it still a looonng way for me to have enough > cash on > > > > > buying > > > > > > one both netbook or tablets...spend all my money on my > > > workstation/gaming > > > > > > desktop ^^ > > > > > > > > hmm, i may reconsider what u said about tablets, since the world > now > > > move > > > > > > forwards with touchscreen + tabloids hybrids..lol..giving me more > > > apps to > > > > > > run all my works... > > > > > > but the cons will be just one...i will not be able to work on my > GMA > > > > > driver > > > > > > on the go ^^ and that would be bad...lol > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:49 AM, tribaljet < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > God no! Laptops man :) I don't even consider laptops being real > > > > > > > computers, much less netbooks. Maybe you should wait for > tablets to > > > > > > > drop prices a bit... > > > > > > > > > On Oct 28, 8:47 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > ah yes, the cheap broadband package with free netbooks...lol, > my > > > > > > > country's > > > > > > > > ISP just started to promote that early this year...so yeah, > > > > > > > netbooks...but > > > > > > > > still, if i have the chance, i do want to buy a cheap netbook > > > (and i > > > > > mean > > > > > > > > very cheap i can find one) just to carry around..i seldom at > home > > > and > > > > > > > often > > > > > > > > got home at 2AM, so i do need a netbook, laptop are too > expensive > > > for > > > > > > > > general working device on the go ^^..lol, speaking of which, > it's > > > > > almost > > > > > > > 4 > > > > > > > > AM here...i need to get some sleep...see u guys later ^^ > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:42 AM, tribaljet < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > It's not an app, it's just manually adding shaders to the > whole > > > > > game. > > > > > > > > > Many schools have special deals of lower priced computers, > that > > > > > > > > > sometimes come with some sort of light mobile broadband > deal. I > > > got > > > > > > > > > mine like that, and it was quite cheap. > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 28, 8:04 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > lol, 450$ is somewhat still expensive for students... > > > > > > > > > > > > for comparison, a laptop , mainstream cost around RM2000+ > > > here.. > > > > > > > > > > > > a software that change the game's looks? cool ^^ what's > the > > > app > > > > > name? > > > > > > > > > maybe > > > > > > > > > > i can test it out too .. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:42 AM, tribaljet < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, yes! Finally :) it's because the cpu is directed > to > > > the > > > > > wrong > > > > > > > > > > > market, it was always meant to be a truly mobile thing. > And > > > > > about > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > low prices, we are seeing laptops costing less than > 450$, > > > which > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > > > play most games, even if at low settings because of the > > > newer > > > > > intel > > > > > > > > > > > igps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Btw Angelic, I found a little piece of software that > can > > > custom > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > way our games look, and it is something I think can be > > > > > implemented > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > the CP hussam is developing, I'll need to test it a > bit, > > > but > > > > > you > > > > > > > might > > > > > > > > > > > be interested. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 28, 7:28 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Atom cant be compare to its big brother CPUs..Atom is > the > > > > > very > > > > > > > low > > > > > > > > > end > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > is capable only for simple processing, not > workstation > > > and > > > > > heavy > > > > > > > > > > > gaming... > > > > > > > > > > > > that said, intel made Atom to the wrong market group, > imo > > > > > Atom > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > optimize for mobile usage such as tablets and > phones..oh > > > > > wait, > > > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > am i > > > > > > > > > > > > saying, intel never had their products management at > the > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > track... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not to mention most hardware companies like Intel > will > > > push > > > > > > > companies > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > make their product price high by making their CPU > price > > > > > > > high...when > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > truth is most Low Voltage i3 cost the same as Atom > D4xx > > > > > > > > > > > > series...lol...that's just to make Atom mainstream > and > > > cover > > > > > > > their > > > > > > > > > > > mistakes > > > > > > > > > > > > on making the product at the first place... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @tribaljet > > > > > > > > > > > > lol, yeah, most ppl do hate netbooks, no surprise > their > > > bro, > > > > > i > > > > > > > > > respect ur > > > > > > > > > > > > opinion, but i do often look both good and bad of a > > > certain > > > > > > > > > products...so > > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > my opinion , if companies like acer (known for their > Acer > > > > > One, > > > > > > > > > Timeline > > > > > > > > > > > > series and etc) and Dell (Dell mini and etc) wont > reduce > > > > > their > > > > > > > > > > > lightweight > > > > > > > > > > > > laptops to a lower price, then netbooks still will be > top > > > > > selling > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > low > > > > > > > > > > > end > > > > > > > > > > > > customer.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:08 AM, tribaljet < > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's always a performance indicator when certain > > > hardware > > > > > > > devices > > > > > > > > > > > > > aren't used for more serious IT market segments, > and if > > > I > > > > > > > recall > > > > > > > > > > > > > correctly, atoms and neos are not to be used on > even > > > the > > > > > lowest > > > > > > > > > > > > > workstation computers. And what core 2 duos are > slower > > > than > > > > > > > atoms? > > > > > > > > > I'm > > > > > > > > > > > > > guessing you're talking about those new dual core > atoms > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > haven't > > > > > > > > > > > > > been shipped to most of the world yet, cpus that I > > > don't > > > > > > > believe to > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > faster than any c2d, but I'm curious to know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 28, 5:50 pm, Koolguy007 < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It still beat my old Pentium 4 2.5 GHz gaming rig > > > into > > > > > the > > > > > > > ground > > > > > > > > > > > (and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes I know its way obsolete). The new Atom > processors > > > are > > > > > > > > > starting to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bypass some of the low end Core 2 Duos. They > still > > > aren't > > > > > > > power > > > > > > > > > > > houses > > > > > > > > > > > > > > though I will agree. My friend has a 14 inch > laptop > > > that > > > > > he > > > > > > > got > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $300, and it ran WoW at about the same speed as > it > > > did on > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > netbook. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > His is a Centrino based system with Ati graphics. > I > > > don't > > > > > > > believe > > > > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was optimized though. It just depends on what you > > > want to > > > > > do > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > where > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you want to do it. Plus if this thing had enough > > > power to > > > > > > > play > > > > > > > > > fun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > games then my homework would never get done lol. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 28, 12:17 pm, tribaljet < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree that everyone has their own opinion on > the > > > > > matter. > > > > > > > I'm > > > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > saying that you have laptops that cost as > little as > > > a > > > > > > > netbook, > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > outperform it in basically every way. If > netbooks > > > had > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > > cpus, > > > > > > > > > > > any > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pentium dual core or low voltage core duo would > > > > > suffice, I > > > > > > > > > wouldn't > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so against it. And do keep in mind that such > cpus > > > are > > > > > quite > > > > > > > > > cheap > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > ... > > > > read more ยป > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- Laptop: Acer Aspire Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz Intel GMA 950 IGP Intel 945 Chipset 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 80GB standard PATA HDD Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
