maybe this can be of help http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa970912.aspx it seems that he definitely disabled multisample (value equal to 0) while microsoft had it set on 4 by default ( in a range from 0 to 16) this should affect the whole 3d performance... by the way I'm just reporting an impression based on the link i posted =)
On 3 Dic, 05:10, Kiki <[email protected]> wrote: > hmm... another interesting lines of parameter... > > even though both of them (DisableHWAcceleration and > Acceleration.Level) have similar task (hardware acceleration things), > seems they have different way to do the task... or do they complement > each other so that they can't exist without the other? ...or > DisbaleHWAcceleration is more to "hard calibrating", while > "Acceleration.Level" is more to "soft calibrating" because it has more > values to be choose? @_@ > > - Acceleration.Level has 5 values ranging from 0 to 5 > - DisableHardwareAcceleration has 2 values, only capable to understand > 0 or 1 (or maybe any numbers that's not ZERO), "true"/"false", > "enable"/"disable", "yes"/"no" ?? > > ...it's just my impression to both of them "at a glance", so please > correct me if I'm wrong. >_< > > On Dec 3, 7:38 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yeah, it HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Control\Class > > \{4D36E968-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002BE10318}\0000 (and 0001) > > > It's a 32-bit DWORD called "Acceleration.Level", with values ranging > > from 5 (disabled) all the way to 0 (full hw accel). 945GME defaults at > > 4 (minimum accel). If the value doesn't exist, just create it. > > > The results didn't seem to be consistent for some people. I did notice > > improvements going from default 4 to 1 (2nd highest value), but I > > can't link you to my results as google groups is messing up and > > doesn't open pages for me. > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
