Actually he didn't turn off multisampling, but disabled multisampling
from being used. It was set as having a maximum value of x4, and now
not even x1 can't be used. So if it wasn't being used in the first
place, it won't affect performance at all.

On 3 Dez, 09:23, Zentradis <[email protected]> wrote:
> maybe this can be of help  
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa970912.aspx
>  it seems that he definitely disabled multisample (value equal to 0)
> while microsoft had it set on 4 by default ( in a range from 0 to 16)
> this should affect the whole 3d performance... by the way I'm just
> reporting an impression based on the link i posted =)
>
> On 3 Dic, 05:10, Kiki <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > hmm... another interesting lines of parameter...
>
> > even though both of them (DisableHWAcceleration and
> > Acceleration.Level) have similar task (hardware acceleration things),
> > seems they have different way to do the task... or do they complement
> > each other so that they can't exist without the other? ...or
> > DisbaleHWAcceleration is more to "hard calibrating", while
> > "Acceleration.Level" is more to "soft calibrating" because it has more
> > values to be choose? @_@
>
> > - Acceleration.Level has 5 values ranging from 0 to 5
> > - DisableHardwareAcceleration has 2 values, only capable to understand
> > 0 or 1 (or maybe any numbers that's not ZERO), "true"/"false",
> > "enable"/"disable", "yes"/"no" ??
>
> > ...it's just my impression to both of them "at a glance", so please
> > correct me if I'm wrong. >_<
>
> > On Dec 3, 7:38 am, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Yeah, it HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Control\Class
> > > \{4D36E968-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002BE10318}\0000 (and 0001)
>
> > > It's a 32-bit DWORD called "Acceleration.Level", with values ranging
> > > from 5 (disabled) all the way to 0 (full hw accel). 945GME defaults at
> > > 4 (minimum accel). If the value doesn't exist, just create it.
>
> > > The results didn't seem to be consistent for some people. I did notice
> > > improvements going from default 4 to 1 (2nd highest value), but I
> > > can't link you to my results as google groups is messing up and
> > > doesn't open pages for me.
>
>

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to