Nah I remember Vista was pretty laggy @ Home Premium. Even I used Task Manager to bring down some resources. Trust me, I used Win 98 for 5 years Windows XP for 8 years, Windows Vista 6 years and Windows 7 for 1 year.I admit, Vista can be faster than Windows 7 sometimes. Its rare :P
On Dec 30, 4:36 am, Derp <[email protected]> wrote: > Vista Home Basic isn't that bad. Uses less resources than Windows 7 > Home Premium. > > On Dec 30, 5:39 am, PL4YaH <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I don't get it. lol jk > > > Anyways Vista was one of the worst OS ever made. I even prefer using > > Windows 98 than Vista I mean seriously. Vista makes your pc lag and > > slow. Idk what microsoft put in Vista but when Windows 7 was released. > > All the stuff that makes Vista slow & lag dead & gone. Not all of them > > but most of them are dead & gone. Vista also has one of the worst > > gaming performance i ever seen. I think I recall having Windows 98 > > once and played GTA Vice City with a nice FPS (24-30). When I switched > > to Vista, GTA VC lags like hell(10-20). Idk why though I think > > microsoft ran out of ideas when they first even think about having > > another OS after XP. Windows Vista is just for looks, Not > > performance. > > > Hence Viscrap :) > > On Dec 30, 3:24 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > well, put it simple.... Windows Vista + Crap Software = Viscrap... :) > > > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 3:07 AM, PL4YaH <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Lmao. I was once a XP user too. I remember I had a Koobface virus (The > > > > facebook virus) lol I used the Anti-Malwarebytes & AVG & it still > > > > didn't get removed. Anyways, Whats a Viscrap? Sounds like a funny > > > > program. > > > > > On Dec 30, 2:51 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > lol , i was once a XP users even after Viscrap launch..i do not dare > > > > > to > > > > > touch Viscrap...lol....it's like an HIV in Windows world... > > > > > > but also, at the launch of Win7, after RC2 release, XP died on me, > > > > indected > > > > > with baddass virus and all my XP system make is a xP face...lol... > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:48 AM, PL4YaH <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > True. No disagree's there. XP is not a very good OS to be safe. > > > > > > > On Dec 30, 2:46 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > XP may be winning in terms of performance...overall XP is > > > > > > > lightweight > > > > and > > > > > > > good performing OS, but despite that, XP is indeed a nesting place > > > > for > > > > > > quite > > > > > > > a lot of viruses and worms..even with most up to date and state of > > > > the > > > > > > art > > > > > > > Antivirus engine..XP kernel is quite vulnerable to attacks and > > > > > > > that > > > > means > > > > > > > major let down...although, i have to say while win7 might not > > > > > > > beat XP > > > > > > > performance, it does have huge performance boost over > > > > > > > Viscrap..with > > > > newer > > > > > > > tech compatibility with todays computing, id say it does feel more > > > > > > superior > > > > > > > to XP...but generally, if in terms of computing alone, and > > > > > > > everyday > > > > task > > > > > > for > > > > > > > computer, subtract gaming in that equations, then any Linux distro > > > > will > > > > > > do > > > > > > > the job...it does perform well in everyday task and again if a > > > > > > > person > > > > not > > > > > > > into heavy gaming, linux is recommended... :) > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:53 PM, PL4YaH <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I searched up Windows XP vs Windows 7 in gaming performance and > > > > > > > > I'm > > > > > > > > very surprised that Windows XP beats Windows 7 in a long shot > > > > > > > > with > > > > the > > > > > > > > gaming performance. I always thought Windows 7 beats the rest of > > > > the > > > > > > > > OS but I guess i was wrong. I just switched to Windows 7 because > > > > the > > > > > > > > modded drivers works better on that OS. > > > > > > > > > On Dec 29, 6:42 pm, Derp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > GNU/Linux would be a better alternative in that case. Most > > > > distros > > > > > > > > > perform better than XP, better security than Windows 7, and > > > > > > > > > it's > > > > > > known > > > > > > > > > for stability. > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 29, 9:26 am, MAD_BEAST <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > if you are wondering why installing WIN on a machine with > > > > > > > > > > </= > > > > 512MB > > > > > > > > > > ram is because WIN7 is safer, WIN XP is a nest of viruses > > > > > > > > > > and a > > > > > > > > > > formated OS every 3 months, and IM NOT TALING ABOUT IGP > > > > > > > > > > gaming > > > > just > > > > > > > > > > saftely and stability > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > -- > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
