One final note, I dare any of you to listen to both a pair of Beats by Dr. Dre (MSRP $300) and a pair of JVC HARX700 (MSRP $33), and tell me if you can see the difference between them. Oh, and if you really want to kill the Beats, just listen to a pair of JVC HARX900 (MSRP $59) and realize the difference.
No need to go to Mid-Fi headphones, quality entry headphones will be enough. On 22 Abr, 07:40, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > That being said, as long as you guys stay away from the brands I told > you about and between the brands I recommended, you'll be just fine :D > > On 22 Abr, 07:23, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > MAD, I'm more knowledgeable about this that you assume. Like I said > > before, MDR reference is very vague as there many Sony models with > > that reference. You can get a pair of Sony MDR-V700 or a pair of > > MDR-7506 for a third of the price of Beats and blowing them out of the > > water. > > > Skullcandy headphones are the worst, that's the correct sentence. > > They're not good in anything, they're gaudy trash sounding pieces of > > plastic. > > > While Beats Pro aren't so overpriced trash, they're still absurdly > > overpriced and overall frowned upon by ALL who are in the pro audio > > business, as well as everyone on the audiophile community. Beats are > > an offence on audio on several levels. I'm very sorry you were fooled > > into getting Beats MAD, but hopefully in the future you will get > > actually good things. If you tell me what do you look for on > > headphones, I'll tell you a couple alternatives that will serve you > > better than those Beats in every possible aspect. > > > The only good thing Monster did were their Turbine IEM line. On the > > other hand, Beats should be a capital sin, along with the other 7. > > Yes, they're that bad. > > Correction, there is another good thing Monster did, and that's > > marketing, as they can peddle their expensive junk to people who buy > > tons of iPods and get those worthless headphones thinking they're the > > shit. And yes, they're real shit indeed. > > > There is absolutely NO positive point or reason on getting Beats. > > > I'm not a first time "sailor" when it comes to audio, so give me some > > credit man. > > > But images speak better than words, so I leave you a little video from > > a very renowned individual in the REAL Hi-Fi > > world:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipZY0qGrA9Y&feature=feedlik > > > Months ago there was a kid who was making fun of the community and the > > work done here, as well as praising "mods" done by youtube folks. I > > don't know if he was one of those, but there were some accusations > > made against the group and people here, things that aren't tolerable. > > > On 22 Abr, 06:48, "Jose Villegas (MADBEAST)" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > ahhahahaha easy kids... its not a problem... its just a discussion on > > > something dosent worth a fight > > > > I do agree Skullcandy are not the best headphones, earphones... bu > > > they are not too expensive, i had a couple once, good stuff nothing > > > special just cool headphones for kids and girls... not for men... > > > > I do agree Beats are insanely expensive, and SOME MODELS are > > > overpriced, but PRO really worth it are professional devices for > > > musicians... we are not talking about amateur gear, as i said i have > > > studio and are way better than MDR Sony which did cost x2... > > > > Who got banned? why? -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
