=================================================================================================== 
Games I Tried so far
===================================================================================================

Killing floor:(20-25 fps) good
game                                      Rating
8/10


Battlefield play4free:(10-15 fps) lags a lot and takes time to
load      rating 5/10


Battlefield 2142: (25-30 fps) brilliant game and indeed
playable         rating 9/10


Left4dead:(15fps) lags here and there but playable


Battlefield heroes:(not sure about fps) but the game is good more like
team fortress 2 but tf2 is much better   rating 7/10



Ashes cricket 2009(full game) : (not sure about fps)the game is
playable but hats and hair is white
rating
7/10



World of tanks:(not sure about fps) there is no ground (white)
rating 4/10


Counter strike source:(20-30 fps) playable              rating 8/10


Doom 3: (not sure about fps) playable.. didnt like the game
rating 5/10


Team fortress 2:(15-25 fps) a excellent game........its indeed
playable  rating 9.5/10

===================================================================================================
                        Game which i have downloaded and currently
getting it to work
                                         (waiting for v1.3)
===================================================================================================

Call of duty 4




at last the game which did not worked is Battlefield 2



On Apr 22, 6:10 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote:
> lol, i jus twish Square would ended up buying the Enix company and making
> them own instead of a 50-50 or 60-40 situation...
>
> about EA, the fact that when i was a kid, i always look high in EA games,
> mainly the Need For Speed Series, the first i played was the NFS III : Hot
> Pursuit
> in comparison, the Hot Pursuit today cant be compared to that classics :( i
> just wish they just made the NFS 3 with better graphics now... :((
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > But then again, Square-Enix sounds kinda 'far galaxy name' than
> > Square-Konami :P Just kidding.
>
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Squaresoft would make amazing games if it was tied to Konami for
> >> instance. Enix is basically a money making corp that spurts out the
> >> occasionally good game. Yes, I found FF XII alright, but VII and X are
> >> the best by far, IMHO. But to each their own.
>
> >> Anyway, I'm not a war game kind of guy, I prefer things like Half
> >> Life, F.E.A.R., Crysis, Painkiller, Unreal Tournament, etc.
>
> >> On 22 Abr, 00:14, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > A lot of people believe that, and yeah, I didn't like Final Fantasy XII
> >> as
> >> > much as other games, but that still makes no sense to me after they're
> >> > successful with Final Fantasy X-2 and XIII (which has an excellent
> >> > storyline), and of course, The Third birthday for PSP. I haven't tried
> >> it,
> >> > but it seems almost as excellent as the namesake Resident Evil series.
> >> > But my favorite would still be FFVIII. Yeah, SquareSoft did some sound
> >> work
> >> > in making of FFVII and FF VIII. Of course, Final Fantasy X was a good
> >> game,
> >> > too.
>
> >> > and yeah, With a few mods, BFVietnam is okay. Without any mods, not as
> >> nice,
> >> > though.
>
> >> > BF1942 is world-class, provided that you have Desert Combat Final Mod
> >> > installed. Without it, it's still an excellent game, and worth playing
> >> > several times.
>
> >> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:38 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > While Enix has done ok games in the past, it mostly crippled the
> >> > > creative stream of Squaresoft (now Square), and for that I'll never
> >> > > forgive Enix.
>
> >> > > I'm not a particularly big fan of Battlefield games, but I enjoyed
> >> > > 2142 on lan parties quite a bit. Vietnam was only for multiplayer as
> >> > > well. But this certainly makes one wonder about the future of the
> >> > > series, in a good way:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TzDTFNZq0k
>
> >> > > I belive that EA has been careless as of late, but that doesn't lessen
> >> > > any of the amazing games it launched :)
>
> >> > > On 22 Abr, 00:03, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > @tribaljet: I don't like BF:Vietnam because it feels, you know...I
> >> don't
> >> > > > know how to describe it, but it doesn't have the finish like BF1942.
> >> > > Sure,
> >> > > > the GI joe soundtrack on startup is nice, but the whole Vietnam
> >> theme and
> >> > > > war is not as exciting to play as it sounds.
>
> >> > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Abhishek Indoria <
> >> > > [email protected]
>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > Nah, Espionage. You know, EA has on track some of the best games
> >> in the
> >> > > > > world. It's my third best gaming manufacturer and distributor
> >> company
> >> > > after
> >> > > > > SQUARE-ENIX (Final Fantasy, anyone?) and Capcom.
>
> >> > > > > Yeah, EA has effed up seriously recently, but that doesn't change
> >> that
> >> > > > > there are some excellent games produced by it, either be it FIFA,
> >> > > Dragon
> >> > > > > Age, Spore, MoH or the Sims series.
>
> >> > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:31 AM, tribaljet <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > >> It used to be true :(
>
> >> > > > >> And Battlefield Vietnam is quite good, definitely improves on
> >> both the
> >> > > > >> previous game and the one after. Only with 2142 did things get
> >> back on
> >> > > > >> track.
>
> >> > > > >> Not to mention the most genious horn key placement of all history
> >> of
> >> > > > >> games :D
>
> >> > > > >> On 21 Abr, 19:09, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > >> > I hope "When you hear the name 'EA', you expect some high
> >> quality
> >> > > shit
> >> > > > >> :P"
> >> > > > >> > is a joke :p
>
> >> > > > >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Abhishek Indoria <
>
> >> > > > >> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > >> > > BattleField Vietnam is...uh...sluggish. I mean, it's good,
> >> but not
> >> > > the
> >> > > > >> kind
> >> > > > >> > > of finished product you'd expect from EA.
> >> > > > >> > > When you hear the name 'EA', you expect some high quality
> >> shit :P
>
> >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Espionage724 <
> >> > > > >> [email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> > > > >> > >> Yep you can stop x64 Windows from forcing signature
> >> enforcement
> >> > > by
> >> > > > >> > >> pressing F8 at startup, and selecting the Disable Windows
> >> Driver
> >> > > > >> Signature
> >> > > > >> > >> Enforcement (may be named slightly differently, but you'll
> >> know
> >> > > what
> >> > > > >> one it
> >> > > > >> > >> is).
>
> >> > > > >> > >> You can do the above everytime you restart, or I recommend
> >> using:
> >> > > > >> > >>http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=dseo
> >> > > > >> > >> <http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=dseo>Works well on both
> >> MBR
> >> > > and
> >> > > > >> UEFI
> >> > > > >> > >> Windowx 64 installations.
>
> >> > > > >> > >> Theres another method that I think is easier, but it only
> >> works
> >> > > for
> >> > > > >> MBR
> >> > > > >> > >> installs to my knowledge. If you don't know how to install
> >> > > Windows in
> >> > > > >> UEFI,
> >> > > > >> > >> then it's probably MBR :p
>
> >> > > > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Jose Villegas (MADBEAST) <
> >> > > > >> > >> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > >> > >>> yes!
>
> >> > > > >> > >>> ask Espionage about a method to get rid of that signatured
> >> > > required
> >> > > > >> by
> >> > > > >> > >>> the system its something from the start after BIOS setup..
> >> its
> >> > > easy
> >> > > > >> > >>> and safe to do
>
> >> > > > >> > >>> --
> >> > > > >> > >>> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> >> > > > >> > >>  --
> >> > > > >> > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> >> > > > >> > >  --
> >> > > > >> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> >> > > > >> --
> >> > > > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> >> --
> >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>
> >  --
> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

-- 
9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to