lol, i jus twish Square would ended up buying the Enix company and making them own instead of a 50-50 or 60-40 situation...
about EA, the fact that when i was a kid, i always look high in EA games, mainly the Need For Speed Series, the first i played was the NFS III : Hot Pursuit in comparison, the Hot Pursuit today cant be compared to that classics :( i just wish they just made the NFS 3 with better graphics now... :(( On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected] > wrote: > But then again, Square-Enix sounds kinda 'far galaxy name' than > Square-Konami :P Just kidding. > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Squaresoft would make amazing games if it was tied to Konami for >> instance. Enix is basically a money making corp that spurts out the >> occasionally good game. Yes, I found FF XII alright, but VII and X are >> the best by far, IMHO. But to each their own. >> >> Anyway, I'm not a war game kind of guy, I prefer things like Half >> Life, F.E.A.R., Crysis, Painkiller, Unreal Tournament, etc. >> >> On 22 Abr, 00:14, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]> wrote: >> > A lot of people believe that, and yeah, I didn't like Final Fantasy XII >> as >> > much as other games, but that still makes no sense to me after they're >> > successful with Final Fantasy X-2 and XIII (which has an excellent >> > storyline), and of course, The Third birthday for PSP. I haven't tried >> it, >> > but it seems almost as excellent as the namesake Resident Evil series. >> > But my favorite would still be FFVIII. Yeah, SquareSoft did some sound >> work >> > in making of FFVII and FF VIII. Of course, Final Fantasy X was a good >> game, >> > too. >> > >> > and yeah, With a few mods, BFVietnam is okay. Without any mods, not as >> nice, >> > though. >> > >> > BF1942 is world-class, provided that you have Desert Combat Final Mod >> > installed. Without it, it's still an excellent game, and worth playing >> > several times. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:38 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > While Enix has done ok games in the past, it mostly crippled the >> > > creative stream of Squaresoft (now Square), and for that I'll never >> > > forgive Enix. >> > >> > > I'm not a particularly big fan of Battlefield games, but I enjoyed >> > > 2142 on lan parties quite a bit. Vietnam was only for multiplayer as >> > > well. But this certainly makes one wonder about the future of the >> > > series, in a good way:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TzDTFNZq0k >> > >> > > I belive that EA has been careless as of late, but that doesn't lessen >> > > any of the amazing games it launched :) >> > >> > > On 22 Abr, 00:03, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > @tribaljet: I don't like BF:Vietnam because it feels, you know...I >> don't >> > > > know how to describe it, but it doesn't have the finish like BF1942. >> > > Sure, >> > > > the GI joe soundtrack on startup is nice, but the whole Vietnam >> theme and >> > > > war is not as exciting to play as it sounds. >> > >> > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Abhishek Indoria < >> > > [email protected] >> > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > Nah, Espionage. You know, EA has on track some of the best games >> in the >> > > > > world. It's my third best gaming manufacturer and distributor >> company >> > > after >> > > > > SQUARE-ENIX (Final Fantasy, anyone?) and Capcom. >> > >> > > > > Yeah, EA has effed up seriously recently, but that doesn't change >> that >> > > > > there are some excellent games produced by it, either be it FIFA, >> > > Dragon >> > > > > Age, Spore, MoH or the Sims series. >> > >> > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:31 AM, tribaljet < >> [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > > >> It used to be true :( >> > >> > > > >> And Battlefield Vietnam is quite good, definitely improves on >> both the >> > > > >> previous game and the one after. Only with 2142 did things get >> back on >> > > > >> track. >> > >> > > > >> Not to mention the most genious horn key placement of all history >> of >> > > > >> games :D >> > >> > > > >> On 21 Abr, 19:09, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > I hope "When you hear the name 'EA', you expect some high >> quality >> > > shit >> > > > >> :P" >> > > > >> > is a joke :p >> > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Abhishek Indoria < >> > >> > > > >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > BattleField Vietnam is...uh...sluggish. I mean, it's good, >> but not >> > > the >> > > > >> kind >> > > > >> > > of finished product you'd expect from EA. >> > > > >> > > When you hear the name 'EA', you expect some high quality >> shit :P >> > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Espionage724 < >> > > > >> [email protected]>wrote: >> > >> > > > >> > >> Yep you can stop x64 Windows from forcing signature >> enforcement >> > > by >> > > > >> > >> pressing F8 at startup, and selecting the Disable Windows >> Driver >> > > > >> Signature >> > > > >> > >> Enforcement (may be named slightly differently, but you'll >> know >> > > what >> > > > >> one it >> > > > >> > >> is). >> > >> > > > >> > >> You can do the above everytime you restart, or I recommend >> using: >> > > > >> > >>http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=dseo >> > > > >> > >> <http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=dseo>Works well on both >> MBR >> > > and >> > > > >> UEFI >> > > > >> > >> Windowx 64 installations. >> > >> > > > >> > >> Theres another method that I think is easier, but it only >> works >> > > for >> > > > >> MBR >> > > > >> > >> installs to my knowledge. If you don't know how to install >> > > Windows in >> > > > >> UEFI, >> > > > >> > >> then it's probably MBR :p >> > >> > > > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Jose Villegas (MADBEAST) < >> > > > >> > >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > >> > >>> yes! >> > >> > > > >> > >>> ask Espionage about a method to get rid of that signatured >> > > required >> > > > >> by >> > > > >> > >>> the system its something from the start after BIOS setup.. >> its >> > > easy >> > > > >> > >>> and safe to do >> > >> > > > >> > >>> -- >> > > > >> > >>> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > >> > > > >> > >> -- >> > > > >> > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > >> > > > >> > > -- >> > > > >> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > >> > > > >> -- >> > > > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > >> > > -- >> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> -- >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
