But then again, Square-Enix sounds kinda 'far galaxy name' than Square-Konami :P Just kidding.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Squaresoft would make amazing games if it was tied to Konami for > instance. Enix is basically a money making corp that spurts out the > occasionally good game. Yes, I found FF XII alright, but VII and X are > the best by far, IMHO. But to each their own. > > Anyway, I'm not a war game kind of guy, I prefer things like Half > Life, F.E.A.R., Crysis, Painkiller, Unreal Tournament, etc. > > On 22 Abr, 00:14, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]> wrote: > > A lot of people believe that, and yeah, I didn't like Final Fantasy XII > as > > much as other games, but that still makes no sense to me after they're > > successful with Final Fantasy X-2 and XIII (which has an excellent > > storyline), and of course, The Third birthday for PSP. I haven't tried > it, > > but it seems almost as excellent as the namesake Resident Evil series. > > But my favorite would still be FFVIII. Yeah, SquareSoft did some sound > work > > in making of FFVII and FF VIII. Of course, Final Fantasy X was a good > game, > > too. > > > > and yeah, With a few mods, BFVietnam is okay. Without any mods, not as > nice, > > though. > > > > BF1942 is world-class, provided that you have Desert Combat Final Mod > > installed. Without it, it's still an excellent game, and worth playing > > several times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:38 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > While Enix has done ok games in the past, it mostly crippled the > > > creative stream of Squaresoft (now Square), and for that I'll never > > > forgive Enix. > > > > > I'm not a particularly big fan of Battlefield games, but I enjoyed > > > 2142 on lan parties quite a bit. Vietnam was only for multiplayer as > > > well. But this certainly makes one wonder about the future of the > > > series, in a good way:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TzDTFNZq0k > > > > > I belive that EA has been careless as of late, but that doesn't lessen > > > any of the amazing games it launched :) > > > > > On 22 Abr, 00:03, Abhishek Indoria <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > @tribaljet: I don't like BF:Vietnam because it feels, you know...I > don't > > > > know how to describe it, but it doesn't have the finish like BF1942. > > > Sure, > > > > the GI joe soundtrack on startup is nice, but the whole Vietnam theme > and > > > > war is not as exciting to play as it sounds. > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Abhishek Indoria < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Nah, Espionage. You know, EA has on track some of the best games in > the > > > > > world. It's my third best gaming manufacturer and distributor > company > > > after > > > > > SQUARE-ENIX (Final Fantasy, anyone?) and Capcom. > > > > > > > Yeah, EA has effed up seriously recently, but that doesn't change > that > > > > > there are some excellent games produced by it, either be it FIFA, > > > Dragon > > > > > Age, Spore, MoH or the Sims series. > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:31 AM, tribaljet <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> It used to be true :( > > > > > > >> And Battlefield Vietnam is quite good, definitely improves on both > the > > > > >> previous game and the one after. Only with 2142 did things get > back on > > > > >> track. > > > > > > >> Not to mention the most genious horn key placement of all history > of > > > > >> games :D > > > > > > >> On 21 Abr, 19:09, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > I hope "When you hear the name 'EA', you expect some high > quality > > > shit > > > > >> :P" > > > > >> > is a joke :p > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Abhishek Indoria < > > > > > > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > BattleField Vietnam is...uh...sluggish. I mean, it's good, but > not > > > the > > > > >> kind > > > > >> > > of finished product you'd expect from EA. > > > > >> > > When you hear the name 'EA', you expect some high quality shit > :P > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Espionage724 < > > > > >> [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > >> > >> Yep you can stop x64 Windows from forcing signature > enforcement > > > by > > > > >> > >> pressing F8 at startup, and selecting the Disable Windows > Driver > > > > >> Signature > > > > >> > >> Enforcement (may be named slightly differently, but you'll > know > > > what > > > > >> one it > > > > >> > >> is). > > > > > > >> > >> You can do the above everytime you restart, or I recommend > using: > > > > >> > >>http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=dseo > > > > >> > >> <http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=dseo>Works well on both > MBR > > > and > > > > >> UEFI > > > > >> > >> Windowx 64 installations. > > > > > > >> > >> Theres another method that I think is easier, but it only > works > > > for > > > > >> MBR > > > > >> > >> installs to my knowledge. If you don't know how to install > > > Windows in > > > > >> UEFI, > > > > >> > >> then it's probably MBR :p > > > > > > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Jose Villegas (MADBEAST) < > > > > >> > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > >>> yes! > > > > > > >> > >>> ask Espionage about a method to get rid of that signatured > > > required > > > > >> by > > > > >> > >>> the system its something from the start after BIOS setup.. > its > > > easy > > > > >> > >>> and safe to do > > > > > > >> > >>> -- > > > > >> > >>> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > >> > >> -- > > > > >> > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > >> > > -- > > > > >> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > >> -- > > > > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
