What, precisely, am I saying that's implying we "whore out"? On May 12, 8:13 pm, Tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed. And by having an accessible (read non corruptible by US) TLD, > all the better. Because that's how things continue existing, or we can > whore out like you're suggesting. > > NeoDragon, you're right about Switzerland, I was thinking it was > outside the whole deal, but .ch and .eu are the way to go for our > group. > > On May 13, 1:10 am, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > 9xssf doesn't need to be whored out. It needs to actually have new > > blood come in, and have actual ideas on making it a legitimate thing. > > > On May 12, 8:08 pm, Tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It's as simple as this, 9xxSSF won't be whored out just because you > > > feel that way about it. And I guess you didn't follow my point on the > > > whole monopoly deal, which goes beyond any border, YET residing in the > > > US. > > > > And since you're being such a douche about misreading everything I > > > wrote, do suggest something less idiotic. > > > > On May 13, 1:05 am, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Feel free to find one that can't be taken down in a "snap of the > > > > fingers" when Intel's bat signal appears in the sky. Intel doesn't > > > > just function in America, they function in quite a large list of > > > > countries. > > > > > Doing a direct IP connection isn't going to be a good idea, and isn't > > > > going to be anywhere near as friendly. "Oh, hey! A random IP! I'll > > > > click on this, and I bet it'll totally be a safe place to install > > > > drivers from." > > > > > On May 12, 7:56 pm, Tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > So... much... knowledge... NOT. You want US-owned TLDs? Knock yourself > > > > > out. US isn't the world nor is the Internet theirs. Got it? > > > > > > And where the fu... fudge is alternative TLDs "corner of the > > > > > internet"? LOL > > > > > > On May 13, 12:36 am, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > You mean one that's been distributing modded drivers for longer than > > > > > > the Intel 945's been out, that has legitimacy through both nVidia > > > > > > and > > > > > > ATi? One that's had actual legal action happen before, dealt with > > > > > > it, > > > > > > and continued distribution? If nothing else, I'm thinking reaching > > > > > > out > > > > > > there could be a good idea in general. Hiding off in the corner of > > > > > > the > > > > > > internet, advertised only by the occasional non-scammy Youtube video > > > > > > and the Minecraft forums isn't the way to go. > > > > > > > On May 12, 6:47 pm, Tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > You mean a .net TLD that can be taken down by a snap of fingers? > > > > > > > Yeah... no thanks. > > > > > > > > Actually things are a bit more complicated than that. I believe > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > while Blizzard is big, they have nothing on a monopolist corp like > > > > > > > Intel. > > > > > > > > Planning for the future means no US-owned TLDs. It's that simple. > > > > > > > We > > > > > > > could go direct IP route, but it has to be user friendly, so > > > > > > > going out > > > > > > > of copyright a-holes reach is the only way to do it. > > > > > > > > On May 12, 11:43 pm, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Why don't we see if OmegaDrivers will host drivers for us? > > > > > > > > > On May 11, 10:22 pm, Tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Honestly, I think we should REALLY steer away from US owned > > > > > > > > > TLDs. > > > > > > > > > Things are too problematic as it is for us to be an easy > > > > > > > > > target by > > > > > > > > > using a .net, .org, .com, or any of those. > > > > > > > > > > Designing a website requires design skills which I don't > > > > > > > > > have, at > > > > > > > > > least like I should :( > > > > > > > > > > And Espio, who knows if you can pull of something like > > > > > > > > > Portal... ;) > > > > > > > > > > On May 12, 3:06 am, NeoDragon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Webhost is on his way soon, it'll be hosting > > > > > > > > > > website/forums, like a > > > > > > > > > > proper damn site! > > > > > > > > > > If anyone ( we'll start with the managers first, then > > > > > > > > > > members ;) ) > > > > > > > > > > wants to design the website, give me a shout. I'll be > > > > > > > > > > putting > > > > > > > > > > everything up that has to do with forums. > > > > > > > > > > > Adress will most likely be 9xxssf.net , I feel that with > > > > > > > > > > this domain > > > > > > > > > > alone, we can begin doing things way bigger than here, and > > > > > > > > > > expanding > > > > > > > > > > to more things. > > > > > > > > > > > Who knows, maybe in the future, 9xxssf will be hosting > > > > > > > > > > gaming > > > > > > > > > > servers?! :P > > > > > > > > > > > On May 11, 9:45 pm, Tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, they each did one, and 9xxssf.info was actually > > > > > > > > > > > shaping up, but > > > > > > > > > > > it got taken down for unknown reasons. > > > > > > > > > > > > And yes, we should have an avatar, various sized banners > > > > > > > > > > > for forums, > > > > > > > > > > > etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > I've seen both 9xxssf and 9xxSSF, and I honestly prefer > > > > > > > > > > > with capital > > > > > > > > > > > letters. > > > > > > > > > > > > I've only known about the custom d3d9.dll, not a tool > > > > > > > > > > > that makes them, > > > > > > > > > > > but that sounds interesting. > > > > > > > > > > > > And what's that about you making a 2006 Source based (the > > > > > > > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > > > one ;) ) game? > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 12, 2:41 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I recall DanielPK and Rick van Veen having a > > > > > > > > > > > > website too, although > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:33 PM, arcane cossack > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://9xxssf.net63.net/forum/ThisistheonlyforumIsaw, > > > > > > > > > > > > >and I've > > > > > > > > > > > > > talked to NeoDragon a little on it about development. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, I > > > > > > > > > > > > > haven't seen any activity there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 11, 8:35 pm, Espionage724 > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. I redid the Xfire group, the old one had > > > > > > > > > > > > > > references to our old > > > > > > > > > > > > > > group name (Intel 9xx) and I thought 9xxssf was > > > > > > > > > > > > > > better :) (the old > > > > > > > > > > > > > > group still exists because Xfire's policy doesn't > > > > > > > > > > > > > > allow deletion of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clans, however, making new ones is acceptable) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. "9xx Soldiers sans frontiers", when I put that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as the Clan name for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Xfire group, well, does the S and F in "sans > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frontiers" have to be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lowercase? I'm usually a bit picky when it comes to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stuff like that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Did we have an official avatar-sized picture for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the group? I can't > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recall if we had one uploaded or not. The one on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the site here is the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > old Intel 9xx one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.Whats the news on the official website? Last I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > heard, I think there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was 2 or 3 people who had seperate sites up for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > backing up material, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and that MAD_BEAST was contacting someone for the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > forums. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. I think I might try to create a game using > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Source SDK. It'll be a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > multiplayer FPS, and it will also be on the Source > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2006 engine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (because Source 2007+ have that weird lighting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > issue). Not sure how > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well it will go exactly because I have very limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > > knowledge in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Source SDK. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6. Has anyone ever heard of the D3D9Gen tool for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fallout NV? It > > > > > > > > > > > > > > apparently generates a custom d3d9.dll for your > > > > > > > > > > > > > > graphics card, however > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know exactly how or what it does (but it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > apparently fixes FPS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > issues in FNV, and RIFT). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
-- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
